Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31817159›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Efficacy of Commercial Sanitizers Used in Food Processing Facilities for Inactivation of

Manish Aryal, Peter M Muriana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How Salmonella Works Under Osmotic and Desiccation Stresses.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  3. Phenotypic Expression ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Efficacy of peracetic acid and chlorine in managingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Effectiveness of Chemical Sanitizers againstFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Use of Natural Methods to Control Foodborne Biofilms.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manish AryalRobert M. Kerr Food & Agricultural Products Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-6055, USA.
Peter M MurianaRobert M. Kerr Food & Agricultural Products Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-6055, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6448-1769
Oklahoma State University · US

Funding

Advance Foods-SE Gilliland Professorship in Microbial Food Safety #21-57200National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project #OKL03090Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources at Oklahoma State UniversityR.M. Kerr Food & Ag Products Center Facilities and Resources
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria entrapped in biofilms are a source of recurring problems in food processing environments. We recently developed a robust, 7-day biofilm microplate protocol for creating biofilms with strongly adherent strains of Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Salmonella serovars that could be used to examine the effectiveness of various commercial sanitizers. Listeria monocytogenes 99-38, E.coli O157:H7 F4546, and Salmonella Montevideo FSIS 051 were determined from prior studies to be good biofilm formers and could be recovered and enumerated from biofilms following treatment with trypsin. Extended biofilms were generated by cycles of growth and washing daily, for 7 days, to remove planktonic cells. We examined five different sanitizers (three used at two different concentrations) for efficacy against the three pathogenic biofilms. Quaternary ammonium chloride (QAC) and chlorine-based sanitizers were the least effective, showing partial inhibition of the various biofilms within 2 h (1-2 log reduction). The best performing sanitizer across all three pathogens was a combination of modified QAC, hydrogen peroxide, and diacetin which resulted in ~6-7 log reduction, reaching levels below our limit of detection (LOD) within 1-2.5 min. All treatments were performed in triplicate replication and analyzed by one way repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) to determine significant differences (p < 0.05) in the response to sanitizer treatment over time. Analysis of 7-day biofilms by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) suggests the involvement of extracellular polysaccharides with Salmonella and E. coli, which may make their biofilms more impervious to sanitizers than L. monocytogenes.

Indexed as

biofilmE. coli O157:H7L. monocytogenesmicroplate assaySalmonellasanitizer

Identifiers

PMID31817159
PMCPMC6963748
OpenAlexW2993194614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.