Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31816854›Full record

Observational studySensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

A Personalized Approach to Improve Walking Detection in Real-Life Settings: Application to Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Lena Carcreff, Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu, Corinna N Gerber, Christopher J Newman, Stéphane Armand, Kamiar Aminian

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lena CarcreffLaboratory of Kinesiology Willy Taillard, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0086-4944
Anisoara Paraschiv-IonescuLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Corinna N GerberPediatric Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3353-0038
Christopher J NewmanPediatric Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9874-6681
Stéphane ArmandLaboratory of Kinesiology Willy Taillard, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Kamiar AminianLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Fondation Leenaards 2015Science for Smile Foundation none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many methods have been developed to detect walking by using body-worn inertial sensors, their performances decline when gait patterns become abnormal, as seen in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The aim of this study was to evaluate if fine-tuning an existing walking bouts (WB) detection algorithm by various thresholds, customized at the individual or group level, could improve WB detection in children with CP and typical development (TD). Twenty children (10 CP, 10 TD) wore 4 inertial sensors on their lower limbs during laboratory and out-laboratory assessments. Features extracted from the gyroscope signals recorded in the laboratory were used to tune thresholds of an existing walking detection algorithm for each participant (individual-based personalization: Indiv) or for each group (population-based customization: Pop). Out-of-laboratory recordings were analyzed for WB detection with three versions of the algorithm (i.e., original fixed thresholds and adapted thresholds based on the Indiv and Pop methods), and the results were compared against video reference data. The clinical impact was assessed by quantifying the effect of WB detection error on the estimated walking speed distribution. The two customized Indiv and Pop methods both improved WB detection (higher, sensitivity, accuracy and precision), with the individual-based personalization showing the best results. Comparison of walking speed distribution obtained with the best of the two methods showed a significant difference for 8 out of 20 participants. The personalized Indiv method excluded non-walking activities that were initially wrongly interpreted as extremely slow walking with the initial method using fixed thresholds. Customized methods, particularly individual-based personalization, appear more efficient to detect WB in daily-life settings.

Indexed as

GaitAdolescentAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaCerebral PalsyChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryReproducibility of ResultsWalkingWalking SpeedYoung Adultcerebral palsygait detectioninertial sensorspersonalizationwalking bout

Identifiers

PMID31816854
PMCPMC6928702
OpenAlexW2993358459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.