Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31816619›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

The Construction of a Radiation-Induced Brain Injury Model and Preliminary Study on the Effect of Human Recombinant Endostatin in Treating Radiation-Induced Brain Injury.

Chenying Ma, Juying Zhou, Xiaoting Xu, Lili Wang, Songbin Qin, Chao Hu, Liangqin Nie, Yu Tu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chenying MaDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Juying ZhouDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Xiaoting XuDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Lili WangDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Songbin QinDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Chao HuDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Liangqin NieDepartment of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Yu TuSchool of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Soochow University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to construct a radiation-induced brain injury (RBI) model and assess the effects of human recombinant endostatin in the treatment of RBI. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this study, the RBI model was used. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, hematoxylin and eosin staining were conducted to detect the mRNA and protein expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and assess the effects of human recombinant endostatin in the treatment of RBI. RESULTS In this study, we successfully constructed a RBI model. VEGF mRNA expression was decreased after human recombinant endostatin treatment; however, VEGF protein secretion was increased in brain endothelial cells, and the secretion of VEGF protein was decreased in glial cells and nerve cells. Body weight changes indicated that human recombinant endostatin can increase the risk of weight loss. Brain water content results showed that human recombinant endostatin might aggravate cerebral edema in the acute stage of RBI, but it can reduce the progression of cerebral edema in the early delayed stage. Survival analysis showed that human recombinant endostatin improved the survival rate only in the early stage of RBI. CONCLUSIONS Radiation can induce vasogenic edema and is associated with the RBI occurrence and development. VEGF protein is highly relevant to the induction of edema and thrombosis in the acute phase of RBI and in the early delayed phase of RBI, including vascular repair and regeneration, thrombus ablation and other events. Human recombinant endostatin can reduce the progression of cerebral edema during the early onset of RBI.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsBrainBrain InjuriesChinaDisease Models, AnimalEndostatinsEndothelial CellsHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleNeovascularization, PathologicPreliminary DataRadiation InjuriesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAngiogenesis InhibitorsEndostatinsRecombinant ProteinsRNA, MessengerVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID31816619
PMCPMC6921694
OpenAlexW2996093272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.