Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31816531›Full record

ReviewiScience2019

Canopy Light Quality Modulates Stress Responses in Plants.

Sarah Courbier, Ronald Pierik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-Wide Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah CourbierPlant Ecophysiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ronald PierikPlant Ecophysiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: r.pierik@uu.nl.
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants growing at high density are in constant competition for light with each other. The shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) is an effective way to escape neighboring vegetation. Even though the molecular mechanisms regulating SAS have been long studied, interactions between light and other environmental signaling pathways have only recently received attention. Under natural conditions, plants deal with multiple stresses simultaneously. It is, therefore, key to identify commonalities, distinctions, and interactions between plant responses to different environmental cues. This review outlines the current understanding of the interplay between canopy light signaling and other stresses, both biotic and abiotic. Understanding plant responses to multiple stimuli, factoring in the dominance of light for plant life, is essential to generate crops with increased resilience against climate change.

Indexed as

Biological SciencesInteraction of Plants with OrganismsPlant BiologyPlant Physiology

Identifiers

PMID31816531
PMCPMC6909002
OpenAlexW2990703403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.