Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31816354›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics2020

Inhalable liposomal powder formulations for co-delivery of synergistic ciprofloxacin and colistin against multi-drug resistant gram-negative lung infections.

Shihui Yu, Shaoning Wang, Peizhi Zou, Guihong Chai, Yu-Wei Lin, Tony Velkov, Jian Li, Weisan Pan, Qi Tony Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Drug delivery for fighting infectious diseases: a global perspective.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Shihui YuDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110016, China; Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Shaoning WangDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110016, China.
Peizhi ZouDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110016, China; Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Guihong ChaiDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Yu-Wei LinMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Tony VelkovDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Jian LiMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Weisan PanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, 103 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110016, China. Electronic address: pppwwwsss@163.com.
Qi Tony ZhouDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. Electronic address: tonyzhou@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USShenyang Pharmaceutical University · CNAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUMonash University · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Advancing innovative therapies against pandrug-resistant Gram-negative superbugsR01AI146160 · NIAID · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIAN, ZHOU, QI · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Combating Deadly Gram-negative Lung Infections: An Inhalation and Systems ApproachR01AI132681 · NIAID · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIAN, ZHOU, QI · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132681NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI146160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design and characterize dry powder inhaler formulations of ciprofloxacin and colistin co-loaded liposomes prepared by the ultrasonic spray-freeze-drying (USFD) technique. Liposomal formulations and powder production parameters were optimized to achieve optimal characteristics and in-vitro performance such as encapsulation efficiency (EE), particle size, particle distribution index (PDI), fine particle fraction (FPF), emitted dose (ED) and in vitro antibacterial activity. The formulation (F6) with the mannitol (5% w/v) as the internal lyoprotectant and sucrose (5%, w/v), mannitol (10%, w/v) and leucine (5%, w/w) as the external lyoprotectants/aerosolization enhancers showed an optimal rehydrated EE values of ciprofloxacin and colistin (44.9 ± 0.9% and 47.0 ± 0.6%, respectively) as well as satisfactory aerosol performance (FPF: 45.8 ± 2.2% and 43.6 ± 1.6%, respectively; ED: 97.0 ± 0.5% and 95.0 ± 0.6%, respectively). For the blank liposomes, there was almost no inhibitory effect on the cell proliferation in human lung epithelial A549 cells, showing that the lipid materials used in the liposome formulation is safe for use in pulmonary drug delivery. The cytotoxicity study demonstrated that the optimized liposomal formulation (F6) was not cytotoxic at least at the drug concentrations of colistin 5 μg/mL and ciprofloxacin 20 μg/mL. Colistin (2 mg/L) monotherapy showed no antibacterial effect against P. aeruginosa H131300444 and H133880624. Ciprofloxacin (8 mg/L) monotherapy showed moderate bacterial killing for both clinical isolates; however, regrowth was observed in 6 h for P. aeruginosa H133880624. The liposomal formulation displayed superior antibacterial activity against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa H131300444 and P. aeruginosa H133880624 compared to each antibiotic per se. These results demonstrate that the liposomal powder formulation prepared by USFD could potentially be a pulmonary delivery system for antibiotic combination to treat multi-drug resistant Gram-negative lung infections.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAdministration, InhalationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinColistinDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, MultipleDrug SynergismGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansLiposomesPowdersPseudomonas aeruginosaRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinColistinDrug CombinationsLiposomesPowdersAerosol performanceAntimicrobial activityCiprofloxacinColistinDry powder inhalerLiposomeUltrasonic spray-freeze-drying

Identifiers

PMID31816354
PMCPMC7313379
OpenAlexW2993121097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.