Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31816076›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2020

Prescription Opioid Misuse Motives in US Older Adults.

Ty S Schepis, Linda Wastila, Beth Ammerman, Vita V McCabe, Sean Esteban McCabe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Lifestyle Risk Reduction Model for Preventing High-Risk Substance Use Across the Lifespan.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ty S SchepisDepartment of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas.
Linda WastilaPeter Lamy Center on Drug Therapy and Aging, and Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Beth AmmermanCenter for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Vita V McCabeCenter for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sean Esteban McCabeCenter for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Institute for Women's Policy Research · USMercy Health System · USTexas State University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Trajectories of Prescription Nonmedical Drug MisuseR01DA031160 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SEAN ESTEBAN MCCABE · 2011 to 2026
$3.7M
Prescription Drug Misuse Characteristics in Adolescents and Young Adults: Influence of School EnrollmentR01DA043691 · NIDA · TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TY Stephen SCHEPIS · 2017 to 2026
$1.8M
Longitudinal Changes in Recovery from Drug Use Disorders: A National StudyR01DA036541 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MCCABE, SEAN ESTEBAN · 2015 to 2017
$647k
Nonmedical prescription drug misuse among US older adults: subtypes,motives, and diversion sourcesR01DA042146 · NIDA · TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEPIS, TY STEPHEN · 2017 to 2021
$548k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031160NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036541NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042146NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate age-based differences in prescription opioid misuse (POM) motives and to evaluate substance use and mental and physical health correlates of POM motive categories in older adults.

designData were from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), a nationally representative US survey.

settingThe NSDUH is a household survey. SUBJECTS: A total of 5,826 US residents with past-year POM; 415 were 50 years and older (7.1%).

methodsNine POM motives were assessed among those engaged in past-year POM, grouped into three categories: solely physical pain relief, solely non-pain relief, or mixed motives. Prevalence of POM motives were calculated by age group, with logistic models examining age-based differences. Finally, odds of substance use and mental and physical health correlates by motive category were calculated via logistic models in older adults.

resultsPOM motivated solely by physical pain relief increased from 35.1% in young adults to 65.4% in older adults; in older adults, 84.7% of POM episodes involved pain relief as a motive. POM for solely non-pain relief or mixed motives was associated with greater odds, vs pain relief only, of past-year benzodiazepine misuse (odds ratio [OR] = 4.43 and 6.15, respectively), any substance use disorder (OR = 5.57 and 5.60, respectively), and suicidal ideation (OR = 4.05 and 3.56, respectively) in older adults.

conclusions. POM motives change over the lifespan, with increasing POM for pain relief with aging. Comprehensive nonopioid pain management is needed for those engaged in POM for pain relief, and substance use and mental health treatment are needed for those with non-pain relief motives.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersPrescription Drug MisuseAgedAnalgesics, OpioidHumansMotivationPrevalenceSuicidal IdeationYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidEpidemiologyMotivesOpioidPrescription Misuse

Identifiers

PMID31816076
PMCPMC7593793
OpenAlexW2996476527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.