ArticleHealth policy and planning2019
Legislating for universal access to medicines: a rights-based cross-national comparison of UHC laws in 16 countries.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Access to Essential Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators.International journal of public health · 2026Pooled it
- The prediction of essential medicine demand using machine learning and traditional methods on EPSS Gondar hub 2018-2022 data.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Comparison of health care utilisation and spending among National Health Insurance and Medical Aid beneficiaries in Korea.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- From national strategy to local implementation: a policy analysis of eye health integration and financing in Kenya's devolved health system.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Community participation and contracting between state and non-state actors in primary care: A scoping review of evidence.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Availability of essential medicines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study examining experiences and level of preparedness in Kenya.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Access to essential medicines used in the management of noncommunicable diseases in Southern Ethiopia: Analysis using WHO/HAI methodology.SAGE open medicine · 2024Article
- Covid-19 Recovery and Growth: Promoting Technology Innovation in Healthcare Sector on Hygiene and Safe Medication Practices in Low-Resourced Nigerian Societies.Scientific African · 2023Article
- Utility of the Right to Health for Addressing Skilled Health Worker Shortages in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Article
- A Needle in a Haystack? Human Rights Framing at the World Trade Organization for Access to COVID-19 Vaccines.Health and human rights · 2022Article
- Strengthening the Health System as a Strategy to Achieving a Universal Health Coverage in Underprivileged Communities in Africa: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Shortage of essential antimicrobials: a major challenge to global health security.BMJ global health · 2021Review
- Availability, pricing and affordability of essential medicines in Eastern Ethiopia: a comprehensive analysis using WHO/HAI methodology.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2021Article
- Decolonising human rights: how intellectual property laws result in unequal access to the COVID-19 vaccine.BMJ global health · 2021Review
- Should COVID-19 Vaccines Authorized for Emergency Use Be Considered "Essential" Medicines?Health and human rights · 2021Article
- An intersectional human rights approach to prioritising access to COVID-19 vaccines.BMJ global health · 2021Review
- Universal access to essential medicines as part of the right to health: a cross-national comparison of national laws, medicines policies, and health system indicators.Global health action · 2020Article
- Essential Medicines in Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review of Public Health Law Interventions and How They Are Measured in Five Middle-Income Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Mental Health Outcomes of the COVID-19 Pandemic and a Collapsing Economy: Perspectives from a Developing Country.Psychiatry research · 2020Article
- Legal and institutional foundations for universal health coverage, Kenya.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Universal health coverage (UHC) aims to ensure that all people have access to health services including essential medicines without risking financial hardship. Yet, in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) inadequate UHC fails to ensure universal access to medicines and protect the poor and vulnerable against catastrophic spending in the event of illness. A human rights approach to essential medicines in national UHC legislation could remedy these inequities. This study identifies and compares legal texts from national UHC legislation that promote universal access to medicines in the legislation of 16 mostly LMICs: Algeria, Chile, Colombia, Ghana, Indonesia, Jordan, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Turkey, Tunisia and Uruguay. The assessment tool was developed based on WHO's policy guidelines for essential medicines and international human rights law; it consists of 12 principles in three domains: legal rights and obligations, good governance, and technical implementation. Relevant legislation was identified, mapped, collected and independently assessed by multi-disciplinary, multi-lingual teams. Legal rights and State obligations toward medicines are frequently codified in UHC law, while most good governance principles are less common. Some technical implementation principles are frequently embedded in national UHC law (i.e. pooled user contributions and financial coverage for the vulnerable), while others are infrequent (i.e. sufficient government financing) to almost absent (i.e. seeking international assistance and cooperation). Generally, upper-middle and high-income countries tended to embed explicit rights and obligations with clear boundaries, and universal mechanisms for accountability and redress in domestic law while less affluent countries took different approaches. This research presents national law makers with both a checklist and a wish list for legal reform for access to medicines, as well as examples of legal texts. It may support goal 7 of the WHO Medicines & Health Products Strategic Programme 2016-30 to develop model legislation for medicines reimbursement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.