Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31816065›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Consensus Report on Shigella Controlled Human Infection Model: Clinical Endpoints.

Calman A MacLennan, Mark S Riddle, Wilbur H Chen, Kawsar R Talaat, Varsha Jain, A Louis Bourgeois, Robert Frenck, Karen Kotloff, Chad K Porter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Fourth Controlled Human Infection Model (CHIM) meeting - CHIMs in endemic countries, May 22-23, 2023.Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Shigella-Controlled Human Infection Models: Current and Future Perspectives.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. TheVaccines · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PivotalVaccines · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. mSphere · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Calman A MacLennanBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Mark S RiddleF. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda.
Wilbur H ChenCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kawsar R TalaatCenter for Immunization Research, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Varsha JainBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington.
A Louis BourgeoisEnteric Vaccine Initiative, PATH, Washington, District of Columbia.
Robert FrenckDivision of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio.
Karen KotloffDivision of Infectious Disease and Tropical Pediatrics, Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Chad K PorterEnteric Disease Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, Maryland.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USGates Foundation · USJohns Hopkins University · USNaval Medical Research Command · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USU.S. President's Malaria Initiative · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P008852/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Shigella controlled human infection model (CHIM) is valuable for assessing candidate Shigella vaccine efficacy and potentially accelerating regulatory approval. The Shigella CHIM is currently being conducted at 3 sites in the United States using Shigella flexneri 2a strain 2457T and Shigella sonnei strain 53G. Shigellosis can present variably as watery diarrhea alone or with dysentery, and can be accompanied by manifestations including fever, abdominal cramps, tenesmus, and malaise. For comparability, it is important to harmonize the primary clinical endpoint. An expert working group was convened on 2 February 2018 to review clinical data from Shigella CHIM studies performed to date and to develop a consensus primary endpoint. The consensus endpoint enabled "shigellosis" to present as severe diarrhea or moderate diarrhea or dysentery. The latter 2 criteria are met when concurrent with fever of 38.0°C and/or vomiting, and/or a constitutional/enteric symptom graded at least as "moderate" severity. The use of a blinded independent committee to adjudicate the primary endpoint by subject was also regarded as important. As safety of volunteers in challenge studies is of paramount importance and treatment timing can affect primary outcomes, a standard for early antibiotic administration was established as follows: (1) when the primary endpoint is met; (2) if a fever of ≥39.0°C develops; or (3) if the study physician deems it appropriate. Otherwise, antibiotics are given at 120 hours postinfectious challenge. The working group agreed on objective and subjective symptoms to be solicited, and standardized methods for assessing subject-reported severity of symptoms.

Indexed as

ConsensusModels, BiologicalClinical Trials as TopicConsensus Statements as TopicDrug DevelopmentDysentery, BacillaryEndpoint DeterminationHumansResearch ReportShigellaShigella VaccinesUnited StatesShigella Vaccinescontrolled human infection modelendpointshuman infection studiesShigella

Identifiers

PMID31816065
PMCPMC6901125
OpenAlexW2996705466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.