Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31816040›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

Learning from electronic health records across multiple sites: A communication-efficient and privacy-preserving distributed algorithm.

Rui Duan, Mary Regina Boland, Zixuan Liu, Yue Liu, Howard H Chang, Hua Xu, Haitao Chu, Christopher H Schmid, Christopher B Forrest, John H Holmes and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Learning competing risks across multiple hospitals: one-shot distributed algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Federated Adaptive Causal Estimation (FACE) of Target Treatment Effects.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
  20. DisCJournal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rui DuanDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mary Regina BolandDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Zixuan LiuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Yue LiuDepartment of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Howard H ChangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Hua XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Haitao ChuDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Christopher H SchmidDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Christopher B ForrestDivision of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
John H HolmesDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Martijn J SchuemieJanssen Research and Development LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.
Jesse A BerlinJanssen Research and Development LLC, Titusville, New Jersey, USA.
Jason H MooreDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yong ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Transforming mental health delivery through behavioral economics and implementation scienceP50MH113840 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MANDELL, DAVID S · 2017 to 2020
$6.6M
Bioinformatics Strategies for Genome-Wide Association StudiesR01LM010098 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., WILLIAMS, SCOTT MATTHEW · 2009 to 2023
$5.1M
Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Machine Learning Prediction of Cancer SusceptibilityR01LM009012 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2006 to 2014
$3.3M
Biomedical Computing and Informatics Strategies for Infectious Disease ResearchR01AI116794 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
A General Framework to Account for Outcome Reporting Bias in Systematic ReviewsR01LM012607 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116794NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH113840NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009012NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010098NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe propose a one-shot, privacy-preserving distributed algorithm to perform logistic regression (ODAL) across multiple clinical sites. MATERIALS AND

methodsODAL effectively utilizes the information from the local site (where the patient-level data are accessible) and incorporates the first-order (ODAL1) and second-order (ODAL2) gradients of the likelihood function from other sites to construct an estimator without requiring iterative communication across sites or transferring patient-level data. We evaluated ODAL via extensive simulation studies and an application to a dataset from the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The estimation accuracy was evaluated by comparing it with the estimator based on the combined individual participant data or pooled data (ie, gold standard).

resultsOur simulation studies revealed that the relative estimation bias of ODAL1 compared with the pooled estimates was <3%, and the ratio of standard errors was <1.25 for all scenarios. ODAL2 achieved higher accuracy (with relative bias <0.1% and ratio of standard errors <1.05). In real data analysis, we investigated the associations of 100 medications with fetal loss during pregnancy. We found that ODAL1 provided estimates with relative bias <10% for 85% of medications, and ODAL2 has relative bias <10% for 99% of medications. For communication cost, ODAL1 requires transferring p numbers from each site to the local site and ODAL2 requires transferring (p×p+p) numbers from each site to the local site, where p is the number of parameters in the regression model.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that ODAL is privacy-preserving and communication-efficient with small bias and high statistical efficiency.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsConfidentialityDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsLogistic ModelsComputer SimulationData AnalysisDatasets as TopicFemaleFetal DeathHumansOdds RatioPregnancydistributed algorithmelectronic health recordlearning health systemlogistic regression

Identifiers

PMID31816040
PMCPMC7025371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.