Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31815647›Full record

Trial reportTrials2019

Fecal microbiome as determinant of the effect of diet on colorectal cancer risk: comparison of meat-based versus pesco-vegetarian diets (the MeaTIc study).

Francesco Sofi, Monica Dinu, Giuditta Pagliai, Fabrice Pierre, Francoise Gueraud, Jildau Bowman, Philippe Gerard, Vincenzo Longo, Lisa Giovannelli, Giovanna Caderni and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03416777 nacompletednot on this map

Faecal Microbiome as Determinant of the Effect of Diet on Colorectal-cancer Risk: Comparison of Meat Based Versus Pesco-vegetarian Diets (MeaTIc)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria CareggiRan2019 to 2021Enrolled103ConditionsNutrition Aspect of Cancer, Diet Modification, Cancer of ColonArmsMeat-based diet, Meat-based diet supplemented with alpha-tocopherol (MBD-T), Pesco-vegetarian diet
NCT05941871 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Diet and Chronotype: a Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effects of a Chronotype-adapted Diet on Weight Loss in Overweight/Obese Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria CareggiRan2023 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsOverweight and ObesityArmsDietary intervention - intervention group, Dietary intervention - control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diet-gut microbiota interactions on cardiovascular disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesco SofiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, School of Human Health Sciences, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. francesco.sofi@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7113-7424
Monica DinuDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, School of Human Health Sciences, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Giuditta PagliaiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, School of Human Health Sciences, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Fabrice PierreINRA, ToxAlim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Universitè de Toulouse, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Francoise GueraudINRA, ToxAlim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Universitè de Toulouse, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Jildau BowmanNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) Research group: Microbiology and Systems Biology (MSB), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philippe GerardMicalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Vincenzo LongoInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology (IBBA), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa, Italy.
Lisa GiovannelliDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Children's Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giovanna CaderniDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Children's Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Carlotta de FilippoInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology (IBBA), National Research Council (CNR), Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConvincing evidence suggests that the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increased by the typical Western diet characterized by high consumption of red and processed meat. In addition, some epidemiological studies suggest a reduction in the risk of CRC associated with fish consumption. The role of the gut microbiome in this diet-associated risk is not well understood. METHODS/

designThis is a randomized parallel open clinical trial comprising a total of 150 clinically healthy subjects randomly assigned to three groups: a meat-based diet of which 4 portions per week are red meat (1 portion = 150 g), 3 portions per week are processed meat (1 portion = 50 g), and 1 portion per week is poultry (1 portion = 150 g), for a total amount of 900 g per week of meat and derivatives; a meat-based diet supplemented with alpha-tocopherol; and a pesco-vegetarian diet excluding fresh and processed meat and poultry, but which includes 3 portions per week of fish for a total amount of 450 g per week. Each intervention will last 3 months. The three diets will be isocaloric and of three different sizes according to specific energy requirements. Anthropometric measurements, body composition, and blood and fecal samples will be obtained from each participant at the beginning and end of each intervention phase. The measure of the primary outcome will be the change from baseline in DNA damage induced by fecal water using the comet assay in a cellular model. Secondary outcome measures will be changes in the profile of fecal microbiomes, global fecal and urinary peroxidation markers, and neoplastic biomarkers. DISCUSSION: Although epidemiological data support the promoting role of meat and the possible protective role of fish in colon carcinogenesis, no study has directly compared dietary profiles characterized by the presence of these two food groups and the role of the gut microbiome in these diet-associated CRC risks. This study will test the effect of these dietary profiles on validated CRC risk biomarkers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03416777. Registered on 3 May 2018.

Indexed as

Diet, VegetarianGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMeatAdolescentAdultColorectal NeoplasmsFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRiskYoung AdultColorectal cancerDietIntestinal microbiomeMeatNeoplastic diseasePreventionVegetarian

Identifiers

PMID31815647
PMCPMC6902610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.