Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31815415›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2019

In Situ Neutron Reflectometry Study of Solid Electrolyte Interface (SEI) Formation on Tungsten Thin-Film Electrodes.

Eric D Rus, Joseph A Dura

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Twin-compartment solid-liquid cells for neutron reflectometry.Journal of applied crystallography · 2026
    Article
  3. Controlling Polymer Electrolyte Interfacial Morphology through Chemical Interactions.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  4. TowardACS materials letters · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric D RusNIST Center for Neutron Research , National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg , Maryland 20899 , United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-6888
Joseph A DuraNIST Center for Neutron Research , National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg , Maryland 20899 , United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-959X

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tungsten, a non-Li-intercalating material, was used as a platform to study solid-electrolyte interface/interphase (SEI) formation in lithium hexafluorphosphate in mixed diethyl carbonate (DEC)/ethylene carbonate electrolyte solutions using in situ neutron reflectometry (NR). A NR measurement determines the neutron scattering length density (SLD)-depth profile, from which a composition-depth profile can be inferred. Isotopic labeling/contrast variation measurements were conducted using a series of three electrolyte solutions: one with both solvents deuterated, one with neither deuterated, and another with only DEC deuterated. A two-layer SEI formed upon polarization to +0.25 V vs Li/Li

Indexed as

diethyl carbonatedifferential evolution adaptive metropoliselectrochemical neutron reflectometryethylene carbonatelithium-ion batteryscattering length densitysolid electrolyte interphaseX-ray reflectometry

Identifiers

PMID31815415
PMCPMC7470620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.