ArticleACS omega2019
Preparation and Protein Separation Properties of the Porous Polystyrene/Ethylene-Vinyl Acetate Copolymer Blend Nanofibers Membranes.
Article in ACS omega, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery of Extracellular Polymeric Substances from Excess Sludge Using High-Flux Electrospun Nanofiber Membranes.Membranes · 2023Article
- Advances in Electrospun Hybrid Nanofibers for Biomedical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, the preparation of a novel ultrafiltration membrane and the efficient separation and purification of protein solutions have gradually attracted widespread attention of many researchers. In this study, a hollow porous polystyrene/ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer blend nanofibrous membrane (PS/EVA-BNM) was generated by electrospinning and chemical modification and then used to separate and purify proteins in solution. The BNM was characterized by scanning electron microscopy and specific surface area and pore size analyses. The membrane separation system was assembled using the BNM, which was overlaid to form the reaction layer. The optimal conditions for protein separation were determined by adjusting the operating pressure, filtration time, and pH. The results showed that the rejection rate of serum albumin and the membrane flux could reach 94.35% and 2.04 L/(m
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.