Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31815191›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2019

The SIPHER Consortium: Introducing the new UK hub for systems science in public health and health economic research.

Petra Meier, Robin Purshouse, Marion Bain, Clare Bambra, Richard Bentall, Mark Birkin, John Brazier, Alan Brennan, Mark Bryan, Julian Cox and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What needs to happen to 'level up' public health?Contemporary social science · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Beyond Behaviour: How Health Inequality Theory Can Enhance Our Understanding of the 'Alcohol-Harm Paradox'.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Petra MeierSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-1933
Robin PurshouseDepartment of Automatic Control & Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5880-1925
Marion BainPopulation Health Directorate, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, EH1 3DG, UK.
Clare BambraInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Richard BentallClinical Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 2LT, UK.
Mark BirkinLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
John BrazierSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Alan BrennanSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Mark BryanDepartment of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK.
Julian CoxGreater Manchester Combined Authority, Manchester, M1 6EU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3249-508X
Greg FellSheffield City Council, Sheffield, S1 2HH, UK.
Elizabeth GoyderSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Alison HeppenstallLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0663-3437
John HolmesSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Ceri HughesInclusive Growth Analysis Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9495-8153
Asif IshaqPopulation Health Directorate, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, EH1 3DG, UK.
Visakan KadirkamanathanDepartment of Automatic Control & Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4243-2501
Nik LomaxLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9504-7570
Ruth LuptonInclusive Growth Analysis Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3155-7453
Suzy PaisleySchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Katherine SmithSchool of Social Work & Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0LT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-4102
Ellen StewartCentre for Biomedicine, Self & Society, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-1477
Mark StrongSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-8233
Elizabeth SuchSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2242-3357
Aki TsuchiyaSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4245-5399
Craig WatkinsDepartment of Urban Studies and Planning, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DP, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-9473

Funding

Department of Health KMRF-2017-06-ST2-003Department of Health PDF-2012-05-258Medical Research Council G0601721Medical Research Council MR/S037578/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conditions in which we are born, grow, live, work and age are key drivers of health and inequalities in life chances. To maximise health and wellbeing across the whole population, we need well-coordinated action across government sectors, in areas including economic, education, welfare, labour market and housing policy. Current research struggles to offer effective decision support on the cross-sector strategic alignment of policies, and to generate evidence that gives budget holders the confidence to change the way major investment decisions are made. This open letter introduces a new research initiative in this space. The SIPHER ( Systems Science in Public Health and Health Economics Research) Consortium brings together a multi-disciplinary group of scientists from across six universities, three government partners at local, regional and national level, and ten practice partner organisations. The Consortium's vision is a shift from health policy to healthy public policy, where the wellbeing impacts of policies are a core consideration across government sectors. Researchers and policy makers will jointly tackle fundamental questions about: a) the complex causal relationships between upstream policies and wellbeing, economic and equality outcomes; b) the multi-sectoral appraisal of costs and benefits of alternative investment options; c) public values and preferences for different outcomes, and how necessary trade-offs can be negotiated; and d) creating the conditions for intelligence-led adaptive policy design that maximises progress against economic, social and health goals. Whilst our methods will be adaptable across policy topics and jurisdictions, we will initially focus on four policy areas: Inclusive Economic Growth, Adverse Childhood Experiences, Mental Wellbeing and Housing.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesComplex systemsEconomic evaluationHealth in All PoliciesHousingInclusive GrowthInequalitiesNon-Communicable DiseasePreventionPublic Mental HealthPublic PolicyWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID31815191
PMCPMC6880277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.