Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31815075›Full record

ReviewCureus2019

Developing Laparoscopic Surgery on the Caribbean Island of St. Lucia: A Model for Public-Private Partnership.

Shamir O Cawich, Daniel Kabiye

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shamir O CawichSurgery, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, TTO.
Daniel KabiyeSurgery, Victoria Hospital, Castries, LCA.
University of the West Indies · TTVictoria Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first recorded laparoscopic operation in the Caribbean was a cholecystectomy performed in 1991. After a temporary peak in basic laparoscopic operations in subsequent years, the initial interest waned. While laparoscopic surgery was being popularized in the developed world, there was a stagnation in the Caribbean. There were many reasons for this stagnation, including a lack of surgical expertise, the negative attitudes of health-care workers, active opposition from surgical leaders, and equipment deficiencies, all exacerbated by the global financial recession in the early twenty-first century. A similar situation existed on the Caribbean island of St. Lucia, where laparoscopic surgery remained relatively dormant. After a strong desire by community surgeons to incorporate advanced laparoscopy into surgical practice, surgical leaders in St. Lucia engineered a public-private partnership to achieve this. This review article evaluates the available data, documents the obstacles encountered, and explains the mechanisms to overcome these obstacles to incorporate advanced laparoscopy in St. Lucia. This information is important because it can serve as a template for other developing Caribbean countries.

Indexed as

caribbeanlaparoscopicmissaint luciasurgery

Identifiers

PMID31815075
PMCPMC6881080
OpenAlexW2981470387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.