Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31815048›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2019

Establishment of a new non-invasive imaging prediction model for liver metastasis in colon cancer.

Yu Li, Aydin Eresen, Junjie Shangguan, Jia Yang, Yun Lu, Dong Chen, Jian Wang, Yury Velichko, Vahid Yaghmai, Zhuoli Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Aydin EresenDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago, IL, USA.
Junjie ShangguanDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago, IL, USA.
Jia YangDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago, IL, USA.
Yun LuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Dong ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Chongqing, China.
Yury VelichkoDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago, IL, USA.
Vahid YaghmaiDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago, IL, USA.
Zhuoli ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · USAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CN

Funding

MRI-Guided Dendritic-Cell-Based Vaccine Immunotherapy for Pancreatic CancerR01CA209886 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Vahid Yaghmai, Zhuoli Zhang · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
MRI-Guided Irreversible Electroporation Ablation for Liver TumorsR01CA196967 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ZHANG, ZHUOLI · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196967NCI NIH HHS R01 CA209886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new non-invasive artificial intelligence (AI) model based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) data to predict the presence of liver metastasis (LM) in colon cancer (CC). A total of forty-eight eligible CC patients were enrolled, including twenty-four patients with LM and twenty-four patients without LM. Six clinical factors and one hundred and fifty-two tumor image features extracted from CT data were utilized to develop three models: clinical, radiomics, and hybrid (a combination of clinical and radiomics features) using support vector machines with 5-fold cross-validation. The performance of each model was evaluated in terms of accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC). For the radiomics model, a total of four image features utilized to construct the model resulting in an accuracy of 83.87% for training and 79.50% for validation. The clinical model that employed two selected clinical variables had an accuracy of 69.82% and 69.50% for training and validation, respectively. The hybrid model that combined relevant image features and clinical variables improved accuracy of both training (90.63%) and validation (85.50%) sets. In terms of AUC, hybrid (0.96; 0.87) and radiomics models (0.91; 0.85) demonstrated a significant improvement compared with the clinical model (0.71; 0.69), and the hybrid model had the best prediction performance. In conclusion, the AI model developed using preoperative conventional CT data can accurately predict LM in CC patients without additional procedures. Furthermore, combining image features with clinical characteristics greatly improved the model's prediction performance. We have thus generated a promising tool that allows guidance and individualized surveillance of CC patients with high risks of LM.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceColon cancercomputed tomographyliver metastasispredictionradiomics analysis

Identifiers

PMID31815048
PMCPMC6895455
OpenAlexW2997378041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.