Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31815036›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2019

Angiosarcoma: a review of diagnosis and current treatment.

Jun Cao, Jiale Wang, Chiyu He, Meiyu Fang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 200 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun CaoDepartment of Comprehensive Medical Oncology, Key Laboratory of Head and Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiale WangSecond Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chiyu HeSecond Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Meiyu FangDepartment of Comprehensive Medical Oncology, Key Laboratory of Head and Neck Cancer Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiosarcoma is a highly malignancy of endothelial tumor and represents 1-2% of all soft tissue sarcomas in humans. The aetiology of angiosarcoma is not clear but there are definite risk factors including chronic lymphoedema, history of radiation, environmental carcinogens and certain familial syndromes. Ultrasound, CT and MR are diagnostic tools, but final diagnosis requires pathological and immunohistochemical confirmation. The conventional options of treatment include surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Targeted medicines and immunotherapy have been studied as promising treatment of angiosarcoma. The goal of this review is to summarize the current data regarding of angiosarcoma and its clinical presentation and management, providing a useful clinical tool to explore the optimal treatment.

Indexed as

aetiologyAngiosarcomachemotherapydiagnosisprognostic factorstargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID31815036
PMCPMC6895451
OpenAlexW2995251165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.