ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2019
Identification of potential core genes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma using bioinformatics analysis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- VHL restoration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma improves NK cell infiltration and function.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- DeepPIG: deep neural network architecture with pairwise connected layers and stochastic gates using knockoff frameworks for feature selection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Identification of glycolysis genes signature for predicting prognosis in malignant pleural mesothelioma by bioinformatics and machine learning.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- RUNX1/miR-582-5p Pathway Regulates the Tumor Progression in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Targeting COL5A1.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Identification and Validation of Novel Genes in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma via Bioinformatics Analysis.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most cases of mRCC without an early finding are not candidates for curative therapies, which may be one of the reasons for the poor patient prognosis. Therefore, candidate markers to diagnose the disease and treatment with high efficiency are urgently demanded. Three datasets of mRNA microarray have been assessed to discover DEGs between tissues from metastatic RCC and RCC. 111 DEGs in total were identified according to the expression profile result of genes in the database of GEO. Enrichment analyses for GO and KEGG have been conducted to reveal the interacting activities in the DEGs. A network of PPI has been established to reveal the interconnection among the DEGs, and we selected 10 hub genes. Subsequently, the disease-free survival rate and total survival rate analysis for the hub genes have been carried out with the method of Kaplan-Meier curve. RCC patients with CDH11, COL3A1, COL5A1, COL5A2, COL6A3 and COL11A1 alteration showed worse overall survival. Nonetheless, RCC patients with CDH11, COL3A1, COL5A1, COL5A2 and COL11A1 alteration showed worse disease-free survival. In the Jones Renal dataset, mRNA levels of 10 hub genes were associated with metastasis, and the gene expression level in patients with mRCC was higher than that in patients without metastasis. COL5A1, COL6A3 and COL11A1 expression levels were remarkably related to RCC patient survival rate using UALCAN. COL5A1, COL6A3 and COL11A1 were positively correlated with each other in RCC. These genes have been recognized as genes with clinical relevance, revealing that they might have important roles in carcinogenesis or development of mRCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31814889PMC6895538W2997416065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.