ArticleOncology letters2019
Combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and strain elastography to assess cytologically non-diagnostic thyroid nodules.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with other imaging techniques in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of combined ultrasound contrast and elastography for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Sonoelastography in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A histopathological correlation.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- The impact of TI-RADS in detecting thyroid malignancies: a prospective study.La Radiologia medica · 2021Article
- Independent risk factors and feasibility of ultrasound diagnosis of ultrasound-guided non-cytologically diagnostic thyroid nodules.Gland surgery · 2021Article
- Values of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Classification and Diagnosis of Common Bile Duct and Superficial Organ Lesions under Compression Algorithm.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the benefits of combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and strain elastography (SE) for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules with non-diagnostic fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) results. Between October 2013 and March 2017, CEUS and SE were performed in 226 patients (236 thyroid nodules) with non-diagnostic FNAC results prior to thyroidectomy. The diagnostic value of CEUS, SE and their combination (CEUS+SE) in distinguishing malignant from benign thyroid nodules was evaluated, using surgical pathology as a reference. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS, SE and CEUS+SE in determining malignant thyroid nodules. Subsequently, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of CEUS, SE and CEUS + SE were calculated. The malignancy rate in patients with thyroid nodules and non-diagnostic FNAC results was 26.3% in the present study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy and area under the curve in predicting malignant thyroid nodules were 80.6, 85.6, 66.7, 92.5, 84.3 and 0.831%, respectively, using SE alone; 59.7, 95.9, 84.1, 86.9, 86.4 and 0.778%, respectively, using CEUS alone; and 83.9, 89.1, 73.6, 94.5, 88.1 and 0.865%, respectively, using the combination of CEUS and SE. Overall, the combination of CEUS with SE resulted in higher sensitivity, NPV and accuracy in the diagnosis of cytologically non-diagnostic thyroid nodules compared with CEUS or SE alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.