Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31814852›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and strain elastography to assess cytologically non-diagnostic thyroid nodules.

Zi-Mei Lin, Qing Wen, Cao-Xin Yan, Min-Qiang Pan, Guo-Qiang Mo, Ji-Fan Chen, Pin-Tong Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zi-Mei LinDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Qing WenDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Cao-Xin YanDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Min-Qiang PanDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Guo-Qiang MoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Ji-Fan ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Pin-Tong HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, P.R. China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the benefits of combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and strain elastography (SE) for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules with non-diagnostic fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) results. Between October 2013 and March 2017, CEUS and SE were performed in 226 patients (236 thyroid nodules) with non-diagnostic FNAC results prior to thyroidectomy. The diagnostic value of CEUS, SE and their combination (CEUS+SE) in distinguishing malignant from benign thyroid nodules was evaluated, using surgical pathology as a reference. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS, SE and CEUS+SE in determining malignant thyroid nodules. Subsequently, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of CEUS, SE and CEUS + SE were calculated. The malignancy rate in patients with thyroid nodules and non-diagnostic FNAC results was 26.3% in the present study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy and area under the curve in predicting malignant thyroid nodules were 80.6, 85.6, 66.7, 92.5, 84.3 and 0.831%, respectively, using SE alone; 59.7, 95.9, 84.1, 86.9, 86.4 and 0.778%, respectively, using CEUS alone; and 83.9, 89.1, 73.6, 94.5, 88.1 and 0.865%, respectively, using the combination of CEUS and SE. Overall, the combination of CEUS with SE resulted in higher sensitivity, NPV and accuracy in the diagnosis of cytologically non-diagnostic thyroid nodules compared with CEUS or SE alone.

Indexed as

contrast-enhanced ultrasoundfine-needle aspirationstrain elastographythyroid noduleultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31814852
PMCPMC6888102
OpenAlexW2988325310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.