Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31814753›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2019

ATHENA: A Phase 3, Open-Label Study Of The Safety And Effectiveness Of Oliceridine (TRV130), A G-Protein Selective Agonist At The µ-Opioid Receptor, In Patients With Moderate To Severe Acute Pain Requiring Parenteral Opioid Therapy.

Sergio D Bergese, Marek Brzezinski, Gregory B Hammer, Timothy L Beard, Peter H Pan, Sharon E Mace, Richard D Berkowitz, Kristina Cochrane, Linda Wase, Harold S Minkowitz and 1 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02656875 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety of TRV130 in Patients With Acute Pain for Which Parenteral Opioid Therapy is Warranted

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrevena Inc.Ran2015 to 2017Enrolled768ConditionsAcute PainArmsTRV130
NCT05465226 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A pRospective, Case-controlled Evaluation of oLIceridine for Moderate or sEVEre Pain in Patients With Acute Burn Injuries. (RELIEVE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TennesseeRan2023 to 2023Enrolled31ConditionsAcute Pain, Burns, Adverse Drug Event, Respiratory DepressionArmsOliceridine, Historical opioid use
NCT06619145 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Oliceridine for Analgesia After Cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled270ConditionsOliceridine, Postoperative Cardiac SurgeryArmsLow dose Oliceridine, High dose Oliceridine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Sergio D BergeseSchool of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5641-5908
Marek BrzezinskiSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7412-4247
Gregory B HammerStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7193-3938
Timothy L BeardClinical Research, Summit Medical Group/Bend Memorial Clinic, Bend, OR, USA.
Peter H PanWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Sharon E MaceCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Richard D BerkowitzPhoenix Clinical Research, Tamarac, FL, USA.
Kristina CochraneTrevena, Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, USA.
Linda WaseTrevena, Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-3744
Harold S MinkowitzHD Research Corporation, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6728-5712
Ashraf S HabibDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Arizona Research Center · USCFD Research Corporation (United States) · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USDuke Medical Center · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USStanford University · USStony Brook University · USSummit Medical Group (United States) · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain management with conventional opioids can be challenging due to dose-limiting adverse events (AEs), some of which may be related to the simultaneous activation of β-arrestin (a signaling pathway associated with opioid-related AEs) and G-protein pathways. The investigational analgesic oliceridine is a G-protein-selective agonist at the µ-opioid receptor with less recruitment of β-arrestin. The objective of this phase 3, open-label, multi-center study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability, of IV oliceridine for moderate to severe acute pain in a broad, real-world patient population, including postoperative surgical patients and non-surgical patients with painful medical conditions.

methodsAdult patients with a score ≥4 on 11-point NRS for pain intensity received IV oliceridine either by bolus or PCA; multimodal analgesia was permitted. Safety was assessed using AE reports, study discontinuations, clinical laboratory and vital sign measures.

resultsA total of 768 patients received oliceridine. The mean age (SD) was 54.1 (16.1) years, with 32% ≥65 years of age. Most patients were female (65%) and Caucasian (78%). Surgical patients comprised the majority of the study population (94%), most common being orthopedic (30%), colorectal (15%) or gynecologic (15%) procedures. Multimodal analgesia was administered to 84% of patients. Oliceridine provided a rapid reduction in NRS pain score by 2.2 ± 2.3 at 30 mins from a score of 6.3 ± 2.1 (at baseline) which was maintained to the end of treatment. No deaths or significant cardiorespiratory events were reported. The incidence of AEs leading to early discontinuation and serious AEs were 2% and 3%, respectively. Nausea (31%), constipation (11%), and vomiting (10%) were the most common AEs. AEs were mostly of mild (37%) or moderate (25%) severity and considered possibly or probably related to oliceridine in 33% of patients.

conclusionOliceridine IV for the management of moderate to severe acute pain was generally safe and well tolerated in the patients studied. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02656875.

Indexed as

acute painanalgesiaclinical trialpatient-controlled

Identifiers

PMID31814753
PMCPMC6861532
OpenAlexW2986989127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.