Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31814712›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2019

Fixed Versus Free Combinations Of Antihypertensive Drugs: Analyses Of Real-World Data Of Persistence With Therapy In Italy.

Daria Putignano, Valentina Orlando, Valeria Marina Monetti, Gaetano Piccinocchi, Umberto Maria Musazzi, Roberto Piccinocchi, Paola Minghetti, Enrica Menditto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Non-persistence to antihypertensive drug therapy in Lithuania.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daria PutignanoCIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9021-5440
Valentina OrlandoCIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8209-8878
Valeria Marina MonettiCIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-0942
Gaetano PiccinocchiSIMG, Società Italiana di Medicina Generale, Florence, Italy.
Umberto Maria MusazziDipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Roberto PiccinocchiUniversity of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Paola MinghettiDipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7723-441X
Enrica MendittoCIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8633-5650
University of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Milan · ITSocietà Italiana di Medicina Generale · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyse the pattern of use and cost of antihypertensive drugs in new users in an Italian population, and explore the patient/treatment factors associated with the risk of therapy discontinuation. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, information was collected from a population-based electronic primary-care database. Persistence with medication use 1 year from therapy initiation was evaluated for each user using the gap method. Each new user was classified according to his/her pattern of use as: "continuer", "discontinuer" "switching" or "add-on". A Cox regression model was used to analyse the factors influencing therapy discontinuation. Primary-care costs comprised specialists' visits, diagnostic procedures and pharmacologic therapies.

resultsAmong 14,999 subjects included in persistence analyses, 55.1% of cases initially started on monotherapy were classified as discontinuers vs 36.5% of cases taking combination therapy (42.3% vs 32.7%, respectively, for free and fixed combinations, P < 0.01). Old age, high cardiovascular risk and being in receipt of fixed-combination therapy were associated with greater persistence. Overall, the primary-care cost/person/year of hypertension management was ~€95.3 (IQR, 144.9). The monotherapy cost was €88 per patient (IQR, 132.9), and that for combination therapy was €151±148.3. The median cost/patient with a fixed combination was lower than that for a free combination (€98.4 (IQR, 155.3) and €154.9 (IQR, 182.6), respectively).

conclusionThe initial type of therapy prescribed influences persistence. Prescribing fixed combinations might be a good choice as initial therapy.

Indexed as

adherencedrug-utilizationfixed combinationhypertension

Identifiers

PMID31814712
PMCPMC6858287
OpenAlexW2987066787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.