Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31814330›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic cytopathology2020

Role of TFF3 as an adjunct in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus using a minimally invasive esophageal sampling device-The Cytosponge

Anna L Paterson, Marcel Gehrung, Rebecca C Fitzgerald, Maria O'Donovan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic cytopathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy for the detection of Barrett's esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Emerging Biomarkers for Managing Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Utility and Cost-Effectiveness of a Nonendoscopic Approach to Barrett's Esophagus Surveillance After Endoscopic Therapy.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Screening for Barrett's Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it?Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Novel Screening Alternatives for Barrett Esophagus.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna L PatersonDepartment of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1494-0875
Marcel GehrungCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rebecca C FitzgeraldMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Maria O'DonovanDepartment of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBMRC Cancer Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK A12088Medical Research Council MC_UU_12022/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of esophageal carcinoma continues to increase whilst its prognosis remains poor. The most dramatic reduction in mortality is likely to follow early diagnosis of the preinvasive precursor lesion, Barrett's esophagus (BE), coupled with treatment of dysplastic lesions. The major risk factor for BE is gastroesophageal reflux disease, however this is highly prevalent and only a small proportion of individuals have BE, therefore an endoscopy-based screening strategy to detect BE is unfeasible. Minimally invasive esophageal sampling devices offer an alternative, cost-effective strategy which can be deployed within an at-risk population in a primary care setting to identify individuals with probable BE who can then be referred for endoscopic confirmation. The device that has currently progressed furthest in clinical trials is the Cytosponge

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusEsophagusGoblet CellsEndoscopy, Digestive SystemHumansImmunohistochemistryMetaplasiaBarrett's esophagusbiomarkersesophageal adenocarcinomascreening

Identifiers

PMID31814330
PMCPMC7075710
OpenAlexW2995565038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.