Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31814069›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Reliable quantification of myocardial sympathetic innervation and regional denervation using [

Kai Yi Wu, Jason G E Zelt, Tong Wang, Vincent Dinculescu, Robert Miner, Catherine Lapierre, Nicole Kaps, Aaryn Lavallee, Jennifer M Renaud, James Thackeray and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Does quantification of [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Reproducible Quantification of Regional Sympathetic Denervation with [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kai Yi WuDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jason G E ZeltNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Tong WangDepartment of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Vincent DinculescuDepartment of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Robert MinerNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine LapierreNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nicole KapsNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Aaryn LavalleeNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer M RenaudNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
James ThackerayDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lisa M MielniczukNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Shin-Yee ChenNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ian G BurwashNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jean N DaSilvaCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Rob S B BeanlandsNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Robert A deKempNational Cardiac PET Centre, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. RAdeKemp@ottawaheart.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9136-5563
University of Ottawa · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR CIF-99470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCardiac sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction is associated with poor prognosis in chronic heart failure patients. This study characterized the reproducibility and repeatability of [

methodsDynamic HED PET-CT scans were performed 47 ± 22 days apart in 20 patients with stable heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Three observers, blinded to clinical data, used FlowQuant® to evaluate the test-retest repeatability and inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of HED tracer uptake and clearance rates to measure global (LV-mean) retention index (RI), volume of distribution (V

resultsIntra- and inter-observer correlations of both V

conclusionsQuantitative measures of global and regional SNS innervation were most repeatable using the simple RI method of analysis compared with the more complex V

Indexed as

HeartHeart FailurePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographySympathetic Nervous SystemAgedCarbon RadioisotopesChronic DiseaseDenervationEphedrineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results3-hydroxyephedrineCarbon RadioisotopesEphedrine[11C]meta-HydroxyephedrineMyocardial blood flowSympathetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID31814069
OpenAlexW2993944963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.