Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31813993›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020

Neural Systems for Own-body Processing Align with Gender Identity Rather Than Birth-assigned Sex.

D S Adnan Majid, Sarah M Burke, Amirhossein Manzouri, Teena D Moody, Cecilia Dhejne, Jamie D Feusner, Ivanka Savic

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Brain Sex: Differences That Do Not Differentiate.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transgender data collection in the electronic health record: Current concepts and issues.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Cortical Gyrification in Transgender Individuals.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

D S Adnan MajidDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Sarah M BurkeDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Leiden University, 2311 EZ Leiden, The Netherlands.
Amirhossein ManzouriDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Teena D MoodyDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Cecilia DhejneDepartment of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jamie D FeusnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Ivanka SavicDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
University of California, Los Angeles · USKarolinska University Hospital · SELeiden University · NLStockholm University · SE

Funding

Gender identity and own body perception implications for the neurobiology of gender dysphoriaR01HD087712 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FEUSNER, JAMIE, SAVIC-BERGLUND, IVANKA · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender identity is a core aspect of self-identity and is usually congruent with birth-assigned sex and own body sex-perception. The neuronal circuits underlying gender identity are unknown, but greater awareness of transgenderism has sparked interest in studying these circuits. We did this by comparing brain activation and connectivity in transgender individuals (for whom gender identity and birth-assigned sex are incongruent) with that in cisgender controls (for whom they are congruent) when performing a body self-identification task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Thirty transgender and 30 cisgender participants viewed images of their own bodies and bodies morphed in sex toward or opposite to birth-assigned sex, rating each image to the degree they identified with it. While controls identified with images of themselves, transgender individuals identified with images morphed "opposite" to their birth-assigned sex. After covarying out the effect of self-similarity ratings, both groups activated similar self- and body-processing systems when viewing bodies that aligned with their gender identity rather than birth-assigned sex. Additionally, transgender participants had greater limbic involvement when viewing ambiguous, androgynous images of themselves morphed toward their gender identity. These results shed light on underlying self-processing networks specific to gender identity and uncover additional involvement of emotional processing in transgender individuals.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityAdolescentAdultBody ImageBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPhotic StimulationTransgender PersonsTranssexualismYoung Adultbody perceptionfunctional magnetic resonance imaginggender dysphoriagender identitygender incongruenceself-perception

Identifiers

PMID31813993
PMCPMC7197078
OpenAlexW2996697332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.