Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3181388›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology1988

Chemoprophylaxis in the surgical ward: results of a national survey in Italy.

N Mozzillo, D Greco, A Pescini, A Formato

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotic prophylaxis for hernia repair.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Prevention of early infective complications after laparoscopic splenectomy with the Garamycin sponge.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N MozzilloClinica Chirurgica, Università degli Studi, Napoli, Italy.
D Greco
A Pescini
A Formato

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of a national program for the control of hospital acquired infections, a survey on the use of antibiotic chemoprophylaxis was conducted in 1050 public hospitals in Italy (95% of the total number of hospitals in the country). In each hospital, the chief of the general surgery ward was interviewed by means of a standard mail questionnaire. Answers were obtained from 479 surgeons (45.6%) after two mailings. More than 60% of these reported that they used chemoprophylaxis in clean surgery (mastectomy, splenectomy, hernioplasty). More than 80% used antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery in which antimicrobial prophylaxis is facultative (i.e. elective cholecystectomy, gastric resection), and 97.1% used antibiotic prophylaxis in large bowel surgery. The authors recorded starting times and duration of chemoprophylaxis. Cephalosporins were found to be the most commonly used antibiotics followed by penicillin.

Indexed as

PremedicationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross InfectionData CollectionHumansIntestine, LargeItalySurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID3181388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.