Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31813398›Full record

ArticleGenetics research2019

Implementation of cell-free DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in a National Health Service Regional Genetics Laboratory.

Fiona S Togneri, Mark D Kilby, Elizabeth Young, Samantha Court, Denise Williams, Michael J Griffiths, Stephanie K Allen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fiona S TogneriWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, B15 2TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1657-8662
Mark D KilbyFetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Trust, Edgbaston, B15 2TG, UK.
Elizabeth YoungWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, B15 2TG, UK.
Samantha CourtWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, B15 2TG, UK.
Denise WilliamsWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, B15 2TG, UK.
Michael J GriffithsWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, B15 2TG, UK.
Stephanie K AllenWest Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, B15 2TG, UK.
Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health HICF-R6-381Department of Health HICF-R7-396Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10107Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of foetal aneuploidy through analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood is offered routinely by many healthcare providers across the developed world. This testing has recently been recommended for evaluative implementation in the UK National Health Service (NHS) foetal anomaly screening pathway as a contingent screen following an increased risk of trisomy 21, 18 or 13. In preparation for delivering a national service, we have implemented cfDNA-based NIPT in our Regional Genetics Laboratory. Here, we describe our validation and verification processes and initial experiences of the technology prior to rollout of a national screening service.

methodsData are presented from more than 1000 patients (215 retrospective and 840 prospective) from 'high- and low-risk pregnancies' with outcome data following birth or confirmatory invasive prenatal sampling. NIPT was by the Illumina Verifi® test.

resultsOur data confirm a high-fidelity service with a failure rate of ~0.24% and a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of foetal trisomy 13, 18 and 21. Secondly, the data show that a significant proportion of patients continue their pregnancies without prenatal invasive testing or intervention after receiving a high-risk cfDNA-based result. A total of 46.5% of patients referred to date were referred for reasons other than high screen risk. Ten percent (76/840 clinical service referrals) of patients were referred with ultrasonographic finding of a foetal structural anomaly, and data analysis indicates high- and low-risk scan indications for NIPT.

conclusionsNIPT can be successfully implemented into NHS regional genetics laboratories to provide high-quality services. NHS provision of NIPT in patients with high-risk screen results will allow for a reduction of invasive testing and partially improve equality of access to cfDNA-based NIPT in the pregnant population. Patients at low risk for a classic trisomy or with other clinical indications are likely to continue to access cfDNA-based NIPT as a private test.

Indexed as

AneuploidyCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDown SyndromeFemaleFetusGenetic TestingHumansMaleNational Health ProgramsNoninvasive Prenatal TestingPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCell-Free Nucleic AcidsaneuploidycfDNAimplementationNHSNIPT

Identifiers

PMID31813398
PMCPMC7044975
OpenAlexW2996621039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.