Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31813359›Full record

Trial reportStroke2020

Effect of Additional Rehabilitation After Botulinum Toxin-A on Upper Limb Activity in Chronic Stroke: The InTENSE Trial.

Natasha A Lannin, Louise Ada, Coralie English, Julie Ratcliffe, Steven G Faux, Mithu Palit, Senen Gonzalez, John Olver, Ian Cameron, Maria Crotty and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Instrumental assessment of physiotherapy and onabolulinumtoxin-A on cervical and headache parameters in chronic migraine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha A LanninFrom the Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School (N.A.L.), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Louise AdaFaculty of Health Sciences (Physiotherapy) (L.A.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Coralie EnglishSchool of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia (C.E.).
Julie RatcliffeCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences (J.R.), Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Steven G FauxSacred Heart Rehabilitation Unit, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.G.F.).
Mithu PalitAlfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (N.A.L., M.P.).
Senen GonzalezAustin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (S.G.).
John OlverEpworth Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Research Unit (J.O.), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ian CameronJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research (I.C.), The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Maria CrottyRehabilitation and Aged Care, College of Medicine and Public Health (M.C.), Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
InTENSE Trial Group
The University of Sydney · AUFlinders University · AUAustin Health · AUMonash University · AUAlfred Health · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose- The aim of this trial was to determine the effect of additional upper limb rehabilitation following botulinum toxin-A for upper limb activity in chronic stroke. Methods- We conducted a multicenter phase III randomized trial with concealed allocation, blinded measurement, and intention-to-treat analysis. One hundred forty stroke survivors who were scheduled to receive botulinum toxin-A in any muscle(s) that cross the wrist because of moderate to severe spasticity after a stroke >3 months ago, who had completed formal rehabilitation and had no significant cognitive impairment. Experimental group received botulinum toxin-A plus evidence-based movement training while the control group received botulinum toxin-A plus a handout of exercises. Primary outcomes were goal attainment (Goal Attainment Scaling) and upper limb activity (Box and Block Test) at 3 months (end of intervention). Secondary outcomes were spasticity, range of motion, strength, pain, burden of care, and health-related quality of life. Results- In terms of goal attainment, the experimental group scored the same (mean difference, 2 T-score [95% CI, -2 to 7]) as the control group on the Goal Attainment Scale. In terms of upper limb activity, by 3 months the experimental group moved blocks at the same speed (mean difference, 0.00 blocks/s [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.01]) as the control group on the Box and Block Test. There were no differences between groups on any secondary outcome except strength, in favor of the experimental group (mean difference, 1.4 kg [95% CI, 0.2-2.7]). Conclusions- Findings suggest that additional intensive upper limb rehabilitation following botulinum toxin-A in chronic stroke survivors with a disabled upper limb is not effective. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: ACTRN12615000616572.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyStroke RehabilitationAdultExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementMuscle SpasticityPainQuality of LifeStrokeTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremitybotulinum toxin type Aneurosciencepainquality of lifespasticitywrist

Identifiers

PMID31813359
PMCPMC7004444
OpenAlexW2993541149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.