Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31813316›Full record

ArticleSports health

Play Sports for a Quieter Brain: Evidence From Division I Collegiate Athletes.

Jennifer Krizman, Tory Lindley, Silvia Bonacina, Danielle Colegrove, Travis White-Schwoch, Nina Kraus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Subcortical auditory system in tinnitus with normal hearing: insights from electrophysiological perspective.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Neural Processing of Speech Sounds in ASD and First-Degree Relatives.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Auditory neurophysiological development in early childhood: A growth curve modeling approach.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer KrizmanAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Tory LindleyDepartment of Athletics, Sports Medicine Unit, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Silvia BonacinaAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Danielle ColegroveDepartment of Athletics, Sports Medicine Unit, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Travis White-SchwochAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Nina KrausAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

Funding

Subcortical auditory processing in sports-related concussions and contact/collision sportsR01NS102500 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI KRAUS, NINA · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlaying sports has many benefits, including boosting physical, cardiovascular, and mental fitness. We tested whether athletic benefits extend to sensory processing-specifically auditory processing-as measured by the frequency-following response (FFR), a scalp-recorded electrophysiological potential that captures neural activity predominately from the auditory midbrain to complex sounds. HYPOTHESIS: Given that FFR amplitude is sensitive to experience, with enrichment enhancing FFRs and injury reducing them, we hypothesized that playing sports is a form of enrichment that results in greater FFR amplitude. STUDY

designCross-sectional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

methodsWe measured FFRs to the speech syllable "da" in 495 student-athletes across 19 Division I teams and 493 age- and sex-matched controls and compared them on 3 measures of FFR amplitude: amplitude of the response, amplitude of the background noise, and the ratio of these 2 measures.

resultsAthletes have larger responses to sound than nonathletes, driven by a reduction in their level of background neural noise.

conclusionThese findings suggest that playing sports increases the gain of an auditory signal by turning down the background noise. This mode of enhancement may be tied to the overall fitness level of athletes and/or the heightened need of an athlete to engage with and respond to auditory stimuli during competition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results motivate athletics overall and engagement in athletic interventions for populations that struggle with sensory processing, such as individuals with language disorders. Also, because head injuries can disrupt these same auditory processes, it is important to consider how auditory processing enhancements may offset injury.

Indexed as

AdolescentAuditory PerceptionBrainCross-Sectional StudiesEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleNeuronal PlasticitySportsYoung Adultauditory processingfrequency-following responseneural noiseneural plasticity

Identifiers

PMID31813316
PMCPMC7040943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.