Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31813078›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for bronchoalveolar lavage diagnostics in critically ill patients.

Ying Li, Bing Sun, Xiao Tang, Ya-Lan Liu, Hang-Yong He, Xu-Yan Li, Rui Wang, Fei Guo, Zhao-Hui Tong

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07626073 (h Can Provide the Detection Results of Pathogen Type and Resistant Gene. This Study is a Prospective Multi Centers Study to Explore Using the New Diagnostic Tool of " RPIP " and the Different Detection Methods of Next Generation Sequencing and Multiplex PC R in Patients With Pneumonia in ICU. Further Compare the Difference of Pathogen Identification and Clinical Impact by Different Diagnostic Methods.), which is not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07626073 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

h Can Provide the Detection Results of Pathogen Type and Resistant Gene. This Study is a Prospective Multi Centers Study to Explore Using the New Diagnostic Tool of " RPIP " and the Different Detection Methods of Next Generation Sequencing and Multiplex PC R in Patients With Pneumonia in ICU. Further Compare the Difference of Pathogen Identification and Clinical Impact by Different Diagnostic Methods.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChina Medical University HospitalRan2023 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsRespiratory Pathogens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Rapid diagnosis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying Li *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Beijing, 100020, China.
Bing Sun *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Beijing, 100020, China.
Xiao TangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Beijing, 100020, China.
Ya-Lan LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Beijing, 100020, China.
Hang-Yong HeDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Beijing, 100020, China.
Xu-Yan LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Beijing, 100020, China.
Rui WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Beijing, 100020, China.
Fei GuoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Beijing, 100020, China.
Zhao-Hui TongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, No. 8 Gongtinan Road, Beijing, 100020, China. tongzhaohuicy@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-6857

Funding

Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2016-1-1061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for the diagnosis of severe respiratory diseases based on interpretation of sequencing results. BALF samples were harvested and used for mNGS as well as microbiological detection. Infectious bacteria or fungi were defined according to relative abundance and number of unique reads. We performed mNGS on 35 BALF samples from 32 patients. The positive rate reached 100% in the mNGS analysis of nine immunocompromised patients. Compared with the culture method, mNGS had a diagnostic sensitivity of 88.89% and a specificity of 74.07% with an agreement rate of 77.78% between these two methods. Compared with the smear method and PCR, mNGS had a diagnostic sensitivity of 77.78% and a specificity of 70.00%. In 13 cases, detection results were positive by mNGS but negative by culture/smear and PCR. The mNGS findings in 11/32 (34.4%) cases led to changes in treatment strategies. Linear regression analysis showed that diversity was significantly correlated with interval between disease onset and sampling. Dynamic changes in reads could indirectly reflect therapeutic effectiveness. BALF mNGS improves sensitivity of pathogen detection and provides guidance in clinical practice. Potential pathogens can be identified based on relative abundance and number of unique reads.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAdultAgedBacteriaBacterial InfectionsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCritical IllnessFemaleFungiHumansMaleMetagenomicsMiddle AgedMycosesRegression AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificityBronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)Clinical diagnosisMetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS)Respiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID31813078
PMCPMC7102353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.