Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31813074›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2019

Strategies to Improve Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis.

Christopher Ritchlin, Jose U Scher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Psoriatic arthritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Pain Control in Dermatologic Conditions.Current pain and headache reports · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher RitchlinAllergy, Immunology and Rheumatology Division, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Box 695, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA. christopher_ritchlin@urmc.rochester.edu.
Jose U ScherDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Psoriatic Arthritis Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
New York University · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe therapeutic response to biologic agents in psoriasis is significantly higher than observed in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In this review, specific actions to improve treatment outcomes in PsA are discussed. RECENT

findingsIncreased understanding of disease pathogenesis derived from improved preclinical models and advances in cell-based and molecular technologies provide new tools to identify therapeutic targets. In addition to the important contributions of metabolic comorbidities, chronic pain and the lack of a diagnostic biomarker signal the need for new strategies to improve outcomes. Potential strategies include the following: (1) discover a novel pathway or cellular subset, (2) apply stratification biomarkers to individualize therapy, (3) preclinical intervention, (4) combination therapy, (5) lifestyle modification, (6) address chronic pain and fatigue, and (7) multidisciplinary care. The future holds great promise for enhanced treatment responses in PsA based on improved understanding of individual variation in disease pathophysiology coupled with comprehensive and integrated treatment programs.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticHumansChallenges,PrecisionPsoriatic arthritis,Strategies,Therapy,Transition,

Identifiers

PMID31813074
OpenAlexW2993900939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.