Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31813065›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2019

Principles and Practice of Oral Rehydration.

Sylvia Y Ofei, George J Fuchs

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in childhood diarrhea.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Acute Infectious Gastroenteritis in Infancy and Childhood.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylvia Y OfeiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine/Kentucky Children's Hospital, Lexington, USA.
George J FuchsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine/Kentucky Children's Hospital, Lexington, USA. george.fuchs@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAn understanding of fluid and electrolyte losses from diarrhea and mechanisms of solute cotransport led to development of oral rehydration solution (ORS), representing a watershed in efforts to reduce diarrheal disease morbidity and mortality. This report reviews the scientific rationale and modifications of ORS and barriers to universal application. RECENT

findingsSolutions with osmolality and electrolyte composition different from original ORS for routine and unique pathophysiology such as in malnutrition have met with varying success. Following the conceptual rationale of sodium-glucose cotransportation to facilitate water absorption, other cotransporters and formulations have been explored with the aim to improve ORS efficacy and acceptance. ORS remains the anchor of acute watery diarrhea and dehydration management worldwide. Despite development of different formulations, the current standard solution is the mainstay of treatment for nearly all situations. Efforts to improve oral hydration solution and to increase acceptance and usage are ongoing.

Indexed as

Administration, OralDiarrheaFluid TherapyHumansRehydration SolutionsSodium-Glucose Transporter 1Water-Electrolyte ImbalanceRehydration SolutionsSLC5A1 protein, humanSodium-Glucose Transporter 1DehydrationOral rehydration solutionOral rehydration therapyWatery diarrhea

Identifiers

PMID31813065
OpenAlexW2993241849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.