Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31813051›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Paediatric nuclear medicine practice: an international survey by the IAEA.

G L Poli, L Torres, M Coca, M Veselinovic, M Lassmann, H Delis, F Fahey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessment of reducedAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. EANM procedural recommendations for managing the paediatric patient in diagnostic nuclear medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Review
  7. Evaluation of pediatric malignancies using total-body PET/CT with half-dose [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  8. The effect of modern PET technology and techniques on the EANM paediatric dosage card.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  9. Image quality and lesion detectability in low-dose pediatricEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

G L PoliDosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. g.luca.poli@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2144-6485
L TorresDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, DIC, CENTIS, Havana, Cuba.
M CocaMedscan Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT Center, Concepcion, Chile.
M VeselinovicDosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
M LassmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
H DelisDosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
F FaheyDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
International Atomic Energy Agency · ATBoston Children's Hospital · USUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) decided to initiate a survey to evaluate the current status of the practice of paediatric nuclear medicine worldwide, with the focus mainly on low and middle-income countries specifically in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia. This investigation sought to determine if the practice in paediatric nuclear medicine in these countries differed from that indicated by the survey of the Nuclear Medicine Global Initiative (NMGI) and if nuclear medicine practitioners were following established paediatric nuclear medicine guidelines.

methodsA total of 133 institutes took part in the survey from 62 different IAEA member states within Africa (29), Asia (39), Europe (29) and Latin America (36). The four most frequent conventional (single-photon) nuclear medicine procedures were

resultsAdministered activities largely exceeded the recommendations for most of the sites for DMSA, MAG3 and pertechnetate, while compliance with international standards was somehow better for MDP studies. For FDG PET, the results were more uniform than for conventional nuclear medicine procedures. However, the use of CT in PET/CT for paediatric nuclear medicine revealed a high variability and, in some cases, high, dose-length product (DLP) values. This observation indicates that further attention is warranted for optimizing clinical practice in FDG PET/CT.

conclusionsOverall, in most parts of the world, efforts have been undertaken to comply either with the EANM dosage card or with the North American Consensus Guidelines. However, variability in the practice of paediatric nuclear medicine still exists. The results of this survey provide valuable recommendations for a path towards global standardization of determining the amount of activity to be administered to children undergoing nuclear medicine procedures.

Indexed as

Nuclear EnergyNuclear MedicineChildEuropeHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdministered activityInternational multi-centre surveyPaediatric nuclear medicine

Identifiers

PMID31813051
PMCPMC7188705
OpenAlexW2993471143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.