Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31811654›Full record

ReviewHeadache2020

Content Validity of HIT-6 as a Measure of Headache Impact in People With Migraine: A Narrative Review.

Carrie R Houts, R J Wirth, James S McGinley, Chad Gwaltney, Eric Kassel, Steven Snapinn, Roger Cady

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Headache, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06598813 (Pediatric Headche Assessment Comparing PedMidas and HIT 6 Questionnaires), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06598813 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Pediatric Headche Assessment Comparing PedMidas and HIT 6 Questionnaires

TypeobservationalSponsorBnai Zion Medical CenterRan2022 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsHeadache Disorders, Primary
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carrie R HoutsVector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
R J WirthVector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
James S McGinleyVector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Chad GwaltneyGwaltney Consulting, Westerly, RI, USA.
Eric KasselLundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals, Inc., Bothell, WA, USA.
Steven SnapinnLundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals, Inc., Bothell, WA, USA.
Roger CadyLundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals, Inc., Bothell, WA, USA.

Funding

Lundbeck Seattle BioPharmaceuticals, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe short-form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure that assesses the negative effects of headaches on normal activity. It was developed using the general headache population and prior to the establishment of the now well-accepted FDA patient-reported guidance.

objectiveThe objective of this narrative review was to examine existing qualitative research in patients with migraine and headache, providing insight into the relevance and meaningfulness of HIT-6 items to the lives of migraine patients.

methodsArticles were identified through database searches (National Library of Medicine and Google Scholar) and review of reference lists of candidate articles.

resultsA total of 3227 articles were identified through database and hand searching. Of these, 12 contained patient- or expert-generated qualitative information regarding headache patients' experience (8 specific to migraine [episodic and chronic] patients and 4 citing general headache patients). The combined publications described a total of 283 patient interviews. Overarching themes and specific information were identified that provide support of the relevance of content for each HIT-6 item to migraine patients' lives. Identified effects of headaches on patients with migraine included limitations in daily activities, needing to lie down during headaches, feeling tired, being irritated by headaches, difficulty concentrating, and the experience of pain. Further, previous research specific to the HIT-6 indicated that patients understood the instructions, items, and response scales as intended by the instrument authors.

conclusionsThis narrative literature review demonstrates qualitative research support for the relevance of the items of the HIT-6 in migraine patients, supporting its ongoing use in clinical migraine research and practice.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeHumansMigraine DisordersPsychometricsQualitative ResearchReproducibility of Resultschronic migraineepidemiologyoutcomes researchshort-form Headache Impact Test

Identifiers

PMID31811654
PMCPMC7003926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.