ReviewDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2020
Review of recently used techniques and materials to improve the efficiency of orally administered proteins/peptides.
Review in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Functional Properties and Mechanistic Study of Native Starches as Fat Replacers in Low-Fat Pork Sausages.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Strategies for overcoming multiple barriers of oral administration of protein and peptide therapeutics.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Nanoliposomal Formulation ofFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Carboxymethyl Chitosan-Genipin Hydrogels as Reservoir Systems for Suramin Delivery in Epithelial Tissues.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Buccal Absorption of Biopharmaceutics Classification System III Drugs: Formulation Approaches and Mechanistic Insights.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Quality by Design-Based Development of Solid Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System (SEDDS) as a Potential Carrier for Oral Delivery of Lysozyme.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- pH-Responsive and Mucoadhesive Nanoparticles for Enhanced Oral Insulin Delivery: The Effect of Hyaluronic Acid with Different Molecular Weights.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- SNAC for Enhanced Oral Bioavailability: An Updated Review.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Review
- A Pharmacokinetic Study of Different Quercetin Formulations in Healthy Participants: A Diet-Controlled, Crossover, Single- and Multiple-Dose Pilot Study.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
- Mucus interaction to improve gastrointestinal retention and pharmacokinetics of orally administered nano-drug delivery systems.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Protein PEGylation: Navigating Recombinant Protein Stability, Aggregation, and Bioactivity.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- The Use of Antibody-Antibiotic Conjugates to Fight Bacterial Infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Oral Bioavailability Enhancement of Melanin Concentrating Hormone, Development and In Vitro Pharmaceutical Assessment of Novel Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Peptide-Based Inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV.Advanced therapeutics · 2021Review
- Bioactive Peptides as Potential Nutraceuticals for Diabetes Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Potential of Stimuli-Responsive In Situ Gel System for Sustained Ocular Drug Delivery: Recent Progress and Contemporary Research.Polymers · 2021Review
- Delivery of Orally Administered Digestible Antibodies Using Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- pH-Responsive Nanocomposite Based Hydrogels for the Controlled Delivery of Ticagrelor; In Vitro and In Vivo Approaches.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe main objective of present review is to explore and evaluate the effectiveness of recently developed methods to improve the bioavailability of orally administered biopharmaceutical drugs.
methodsA systematic search of sciencedirect, tandfonline and Google Scholar databases based on various sets of keywords was performed. All results were evaluated based on their abstracts, and irrelevant studies were neglected during further evaluation.
resultsAt present, biopharmaceuticals are used as injectable therapies as they are not absorbed adequately from the different routes of drug administration, particularly the oral one. Their insufficient absorption is attributed to their high molecular weight, degradation by proteolytic enzymes, high hydrophilicity and rigidity of the absorptive tissues. From industrial aspect incorporation of enzyme inhibitors (EIs) and permeation enhancers (PEs) and mucoadhesive polymers into conventional dosage forms may be the easiest way of formulation of orally administered macromolecular drugs, but the effectiveness of protection and absorption enhancement here is the most questionable. Conjugation may be problematic from regulatory aspect. Encapsulation into lipid-based vesicles sufficiently protects the incorporated macromolecule and improves intestinal uptake but have considerable stability issues. In contrast, polymeric nanocarriers may provide good stability but provides lower internalization efficacy in comparison with the lipid-based carriers.
conclusionIt can be concluded that the combination of the advantages of mucoadhesive polymeric and lid-based carriers in hybrid lipid/polymer nanoparticles may result in improved absorption and might represent a potential means for the oral administration of therapeutic proteins in the near future. Graphical abstract Delivery systems for oral protein daministration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.