Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31811593›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2020

Recurrent intestinal fistulation after porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement in enteric fistula takedown and simultaneous abdominal wall reconstruction.

R Kalaiselvan, G L Carlson, S Hayes, N P Lees, I D Anderson, D A J Slade

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R KalaiselvanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Intestinal Failure Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK. drramyakalai@yahoo.com.
G L CarlsonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Intestinal Failure Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK.
S HayesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Intestinal Failure Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK.
N P LeesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Intestinal Failure Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK.
I D AndersonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Intestinal Failure Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK.
D A J SladeDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Intestinal Failure Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK.
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePorcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) has been promoted as a suitable material for the reinforcement of the abdominal wall in Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) Grade 3/4 wounds by Ventral Hernia Working Group et al. (Surgery 148(3):544-548). We describe our experience of, and assess the mechanisms for the failure of PADM (Permacol

methodsAll patients referred to our unit who had PADM used for AWR and ECF were studied from a prospectively maintained database. Follow-up data until 31/12/2018 were analysed. PADM was explanted at further surgery and examined histologically.

results13 patients, (median age-58.5 years) underwent AWR with PADM reinforcement. Twelve of these (92%) patients had developed abdominal wall defects (AWD) and ECF following complications of previous surgery. Six patients underwent fistula takedown and AWR with PADM, of which 5(83%) refistulated. Seven patients referred to us had already undergone similar procedures in their referring hospitals and had also refistulated. Median (range) time to fistulation after AWR with PADM was 17 (7-240) days. In all cases, PADM had been used to bridge the defect and placed in direct contact with bowel. At reconstructive surgery for refistulation, PADM was inseparable from multiple segments of small intestine, necessitating extensive bowel resection. Histological examination confirmed that the PADM almost completely integrated with the seromuscular layer of the small intestine.

conclusionPADM may become inseparable from serosa of the human small intestinal serosa when it is left in the abdomen during reconstructive surgery. This technique is associated with recurrent intestinal fistulation and intestinal failure and should be avoided if at all possible.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallAcellular DermisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsCollagenFemaleHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansIntestinal FistulaIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresCollagenPermacolEnterocutaneous fistulationOpen abdomenPermacol™Porcine acellular dermis

Identifiers

PMID31811593
OpenAlexW2992839379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.