Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31811567›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2020

The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.

Vusal Aliyev, Handan Tokmak, Suha Goksel, Serhat Meric, Sami Acar, Hakan Kaya, Oktar Asoglu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vusal AliyevDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Handan TokmakDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Maslak Acıbadem Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Suha GokselDepartment of Pathology, Maslak Acıbadem Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serhat MericDepartment of General Surgery, Health Sciences University Bagcılar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sami AcarDepartment of General Surgery, Taksim Acıbadem Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hakan KayaDepartment of General Surgery, Maslak Acıbadem Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Oktar AsogluBosphorus Clinical Research Academy, Vişnezade Mah., Acısus Sokak, Salihbey Apt. No:16/D:5, Beşiktaş, Istanbul, Turkey. oktarasoglu@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-1654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic surgery became more popularly in the colorectal surgical field. The aim of the study was to evaluate of the oncological outcomes which patients who underwent the robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. A series of 140 consecutive patients who underwent robotic rectal surgery between January 2012 and June 2019 was analyzed retrospectively in terms of demographics, pathological data, and surgical and oncological outcomes. There were 104 (74.28%) male and 36 (25.71%) female patients. The tumor was located in the lower rectum in 84 (60%) cases, in the mid rectum in 38 (27.14%) cases, and in the upper rectum in 18 (12.85%) cases. Ninety-eight (70%) of the patients has received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. All the patients underwent robotic sphincter-preserving surgery, 101 (72.14%) patients low-anterior resection, and 39 (27.85%) patients underwent intersphincteric resection with colo-anal anastomosis. There were no conversions. The circumferential resection margin was positive in five (3.57%) patients. The median distal resection margin of the operative specimen was 3.2 (0.2-7) cm. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 22 (16-42). TME quality in the in our study was rated as complete in 88.57% (n124) of patients, nearly complete in 7.14% (n10) of patients; and 4.28% (n6) of incomplete. The median hospital stay was 3.5 (3-12) days. In-hospital and 1-month mortality was zero. The median length of follow-up was 40 (2-80) months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92.78%. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 90%. Locally recurrence and distance recurrence rate was 3.57% (n5/140) and 2.85% (n4/140), respectively. Robotic rectal cancer surgery has a good oncological outcomes and feasible tool in the field of the rectal surgery, but required a steep learning curve.

Indexed as

SurgeonsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnal CanalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRectal NeoplasmsRectumRetrospective StudiesOncological outcomesRectal cancerRobotic approachTME

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.