Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31811431›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2020

Deep learning: definition and perspectives for thoracic imaging.

Guillaume Chassagnon, Maria Vakalopolou, Nikos Paragios, Marie-Pierre Revel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence for glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advanced imaging techniques and artificial intelligence in pleural diseases: a narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guillaume ChassagnonService de Radiologie A, Radiology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu, AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.
Maria VakalopolouCenter for Visual Computing, Ecole CentraleSupelec, 3 Rue Joliot Curie, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Nikos ParagiosCenter for Visual Computing, Ecole CentraleSupelec, 3 Rue Joliot Curie, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Marie-Pierre RevelService de Radiologie A, Radiology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu, AP-HP, Université Paris Descartes, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France. marie-pierre.revel@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7906-6499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relevance and penetration of machine learning in clinical practice is a recent phenomenon with multiple applications being currently under development. Deep learning-and especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-is a subset of machine learning, which has recently entered the field of thoracic imaging. The structure of neural networks, organized in multiple layers, allows them to address complex tasks. For several clinical situations, CNNs have demonstrated superior performance as compared with classical machine learning algorithms and in some cases achieved comparable or better performance than clinical experts. Chest radiography, a high-volume procedure, is a natural application domain because of the large amount of stored images and reports facilitating the training of deep learning algorithms. Several algorithms for automated reporting have been developed. The training of deep learning algorithm CT images is more complex due to the dimension, variability, and complexity of the 3D signal. The role of these methods is likely to increase in clinical practice as a complement of the radiologist's expertise. The objective of this review is to provide definitions for understanding the methods and their potential applications for thoracic imaging. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning outperforms other machine learning techniques for number of tasks in radiology. • Convolutional neural network is the most popular deep learning architecture in medical imaging. • Numerous deep learning algorithms are being currently developed; some of them may become part of clinical routine in the near future.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerRadiography, ThoracicHumansMachine LearningRadiologyDeep learningLungMachine learningThorax

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.