ReviewWorld journal of urology2020
The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era.
Review in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Initial experience of the Versius robotic system in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a study of 58 cases.Central European journal of urology · 2024Article
- Technologic advances in robot-assisted nephron sparing surgery: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Review
- Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Robot-assisted Surgery in the Field of Urology: The Most Pioneering Approaches 2015-2023.Research and reports in urology · 2023Review
- Floating docking technique: a simple modification to improve the working space of the instruments during single-port robotic surgery.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Single-port versus multi-port: will "one for all" ever become a new standard for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- Anatomical Fundamentals and Current Surgical Knowledge of Prostate Anatomy Related to Functional and Oncological Outcomes for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Review
- Robotic surgery in urology: the way forward.World journal of urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo review the recent advances in terms of surgical technique and new robotic platforms applied to radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP).
methodsA literature review was performed focusing on original articles on perineal prostatectomy searching via Medline/Pubmed and Embase. The entire spectrum was covered such as development of surgical technique including pelvic lymphadenectomy, adoption of novel surgical platforms, learning curve and future directions.
resultsSurgical removal of the prostate plays a significant role on the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). RPP was the first surgical approach described for radical prostatectomy. This technique declined in popularity secondary to the development of the retropubic approach. Recently, the appearance of novel robotic technology has generated renewed interest in the perineal approach.
conclusionThere has been a recent resurgence on the interest of radical perineal prostatectomy for the treatment of localized PCa driven by the advent of new robotic surgical technologies into the field. Future studies are needed to better determine the learning curve of the perineal approach and its current role in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.