Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31811011›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Association between prescription of hypnotics/anxiolytics and mortality in multimorbid and non-multimorbid patients: a longitudinal cohort study in primary care.

Kristjan Linnet, Johann Agust Sigurdsson, Margret Olafia Tomasdottir, Emil Larus Sigurdsson, Larus Steinthor Gudmundsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond coexistence: attempting to unlock the diabetes-COMISA Link.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prescribing Analgesics to Older People: A Challenge for GPs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristjan LinnetDevelopment Centre for Primary Healthcare in Iceland, Primary Health Care of the Capital Area, Reykjavik, Iceland kristjan.linnet@heilsugaeslan.is.ORCID 0000-0002-0189-9519
Johann Agust SigurdssonDevelopment Centre for Primary Healthcare in Iceland, Primary Health Care of the Capital Area, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Margret Olafia TomasdottirDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland School of Health Sciences, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Emil Larus SigurdssonDevelopment Centre for Primary Healthcare in Iceland, Primary Health Care of the Capital Area, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Larus Steinthor GudmundssonFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
University of Iceland · ISNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the risk of mortality in primary care patients, multimorbid (≥2 chronic conditions) or not, prescribed hypnotics/anxiolytics.

designA longitudinal cohort study

settingPrimary healthcare in the Reykjavik area.

participants114 084 individuals (aged 10-79 years, average 38.5, SD 18.4) contacting general practitioners during 2009-2012 (mortality follow-up to 31 December 2016). Of those, the reference group comprised 58 560 persons who were neither multimorbid nor had redeemed prescriptions for hypnotics/anxiolytics. Participants (16 108) redeeming prescriptions for hypnotics/anxiolytics on a regular basis for 3 consecutive years were considered as consistent, long-term users. They were subdivided into low-dose (1-300 defined daily doses (DDD)/3 years), medium-dose (301-1095 DDDs/3 years) and high-dose users (>1095 DDDs/3 years). All six groups taking these drugs were compared with the reference group.

main outcome measuresAll-cause mortality.

resultsHRs were calculated with the no multimorbidity-no drug group as a reference, using Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusting for age, sex and the number of chronic conditions (n=111 767), patients with cancer excluded. During follow-up, 516 358 person-years in total, 1926 persons died. Mean follow-up was 1685 days (4.6 years), range 1-1826 days (5.0 years). For all multimorbid patients who took no drugs the HR was 1.14 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.30) compared with those without multimorbidity. HRs in the non-multimorbid participants varied from 1.49 to 3.35 (95% CI ranging from 1.03 to 4.11) with increasing doses of hypnotics/anxiolytics, and correspondingly from 1.55 to 3.52 (1.18 to 4.29) in multimorbid patients.

conclusionsMortality increased in a dose-dependent manner among both multimorbid and non-multimorbid patients taking hypnotics/anxiolytics. This increase was clearly associated with prescribing of these drugs. Their use should be limited to the recommended period of 2-4 up to 6 weeks; long-term use may incur increased risk and should be re-examined.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Anxiety AgentsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentAnti-Anxiety AgentsHypnotics and Sedativesanxiolyticshypnoticsmortalitymultimorbidityprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31811011
PMCPMC6924757
OpenAlexW2994084620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.