Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31810689›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2020

Removal of antibiotic resistance genes in an algal-based wastewater treatment system employing Galdieria sulphuraria: A comparative study.

Xiaoxiao Cheng, Himali M K Delanka-Pedige, Srimali P Munasinghe-Arachchige, Isuru S A Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige, Geoffrey B Smith, Nagamany Nirmalakhandan, Yanyan Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Dynamics of antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility profile in full-scale hospital wastewater treatment plants.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Extremophilic MicroalgaePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoxiao ChengCivil Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.
Himali M K Delanka-PedigeCivil Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.
Srimali P Munasinghe-ArachchigeCivil Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.
Isuru S A Abeysiriwardana-ArachchigeCivil Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.
Geoffrey B SmithBiology Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.
Nagamany NirmalakhandanCivil Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA.
Yanyan ZhangCivil Engineering Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA. Electronic address: zhangy@nmsu.edu.
New Mexico State University · US

Funding

Resistance and Virulence of Surviving Bacteria in Water after Various Disinfection ProcessesSC2GM130432 · NIGMS · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI ZHANG, YANYAN · 2018 to 2020
$437k
NIGMS NIH HHS SC2 GM130432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we compared removal of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) in two wastewater treatment systems fed with the same primary effluent: a conventional wastewater treatment system (consisting of a trickling filter followed by an activated sludge process) versus an algal-based system, employing an extremophilic alga, Galdieria sulphuraria. Our results demonstrated that the algal system can reduce concentrations of erythromycin- and sulfamethoxazole-resistant bacteria in the effluent more effectively than the conventional treatment system. A decreasing trend of total bacteria and ARGs was observed in both the treatment systems. However, the relative ratio of most ARGs (qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, sul1) and intI1 in the surviving bacteria increased in the conventional system; whereas, the algal system reduced more of the relative abundance of qnrA, qnrS, tetW and intⅠ1 in the surviving bacteria. The role of bacteriophages in horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of ARGs in the two systems was indicated by a positive correlation between ARG absolute abundance in bacteriophage and ARG relative abundance in the bacteria. Four of the five detectable genes (qnrS, tetW, sul1 and intI1) were significantly reduced in the algal system in bacteriophage phase which signified a decrease in phage-mediated ARG transfer in the algal system. Results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of the algal-based wastewater treatment system in decreasing ARGs and ARB and in minimizing the spread of antibiotic resistance to the environment.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, MicrobialGenes, BacterialWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterAnti-Bacterial AgentsWastewaterAlgal systemAntibiotic resistant genesBacteriophageConventional treatment

Identifiers

PMID31810689
PMCPMC6992497
OpenAlexW2972459094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.