Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31810484›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgical oncology2019

Comparison of three digestive tract reconstruction methods for the treatment of Siewert II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a prospective, randomized controlled study.

Zhiguo Li, Jianhong Dong, Qingxing Huang, Wanhong Zhang, Kai Tao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiguo LiDepartment of Minimal Invasive Digestive Surgery, Shanxi Tumor Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030013, China.
Jianhong DongDepartment of Minimal Invasive Digestive Surgery, Shanxi Tumor Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030013, China. asdjh666@163.com.
Qingxing HuangDepartment of Minimal Invasive Digestive Surgery, Shanxi Tumor Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030013, China.
Wanhong ZhangDepartment of Minimal Invasive Digestive Surgery, Shanxi Tumor Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030013, China.
Kai TaoDepartment of Minimal Invasive Digestive Surgery, Shanxi Tumor Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030013, China.
Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNShanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

Shanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Project no.201803D31167 and no.20150313007-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has recently risen worldwide, including in Eastern Asia. The aim of the study was to explore the short-term and long-term clinical efficacy of piggyback jejunal interposition reconstruction single-tract reconstruction (PJIRSTR), piggyback jejunal interposition reconstruction double-tract reconstruction (PJIRDTR), and total gastrectomy esophageal jejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis (TGRY) for the treatment of Siewert II and III AEG patients.

methodsA total of 300 Siewert II and III AEG patients admitted to Shanxi Tumor Hospital from June 2015 to December 2017 were prospectively selected. Patients were randomly divided into PJIRSTR group (n = 98), PJIRDTR group (n = 103), and TGRY group (n = 99) using the random number table method.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in total operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time of first anal exhaust, and postoperative hospital stay among the three groups (F = 2.526, 0.457, 0.234, 0.453; P > 0.05). The reconstruction time of PJIRSTR group and PJIRDTR group was longer than that of TGRY group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in cases of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, abdominal infection, incision infection, ileus, and dumping syndrome in three groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of reflux esophagitis at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery in the PJIRSTR group and the PJIRDTR group were significantly lower than TGRY group in the same period (P < 0.05). Compared with PJIRDTR group and TGRY group, PJIRSTR group had a small fluctuation range of postoperative nutrition indexes and had basically recovered to the preoperative level at 18 months. Four patients of Visick grade IV presented in TGRY group 18 months postoperatively, which was significantly higher compared with the other two groups.

conclusionCompared with PJIRDTR and TGRY, PJIRSTR can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis and improve the long-term nutritional status of patients.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IIR-16007733. Registered 07 November 2015 - Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.aspx.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, Roux-en-YAnastomosis, SurgicalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePlastic Surgery ProceduresPiggyback jejunal interposition reconstruction double-tract reconstructionPiggyback jejunal interposition reconstruction single-tract reconstructionReflux esophagitisTotal gastrectomy esophageal jejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis

Identifiers

PMID31810484
PMCPMC6898954
OpenAlexW2993026252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.