Trial reportWorld journal of surgical oncology2019
Comparison of three digestive tract reconstruction methods for the treatment of Siewert II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a prospective, randomized controlled study.
Trial report in World journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of postoperative reflux esophagitis in different digestive tract reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer patients: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.Updates in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes According to Surgical Strategies in Proximal Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastric cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Occurrence of Dumping Syndrome After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Can proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction replace total gastrectomy? a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life of reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Roux-en-Y anastomosis and jejunal interposition after total gastrectomy.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- CT radiomics of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: machine learning-based prediction of perineural invasion status.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Double tract reconstruction in proximal gastric tumors: A systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Subclassification scheme for adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and prognostic analysis based on clinicopathological features.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Development and current status of anti-reflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy: a literature review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Review
- Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Quality of Life of Braun Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Reconstruction in Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of two digestive tract reconstruction methods in total laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy in transthoracic single-port assisted laparoscopic esophagogastrectomy for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with esophageal invasion > 3 cm.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for Gastric cancer: A systematic review.Journal of Cancer · 2023Review
- Efficacy analysis of Cheng's GIRAFFE reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2022Article
- Advantages of McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer: propensity score matching analysis of 169 cases.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Comparison of the prognosis of four different surgical strategies for proximal gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has recently risen worldwide, including in Eastern Asia. The aim of the study was to explore the short-term and long-term clinical efficacy of piggyback jejunal interposition reconstruction single-tract reconstruction (PJIRSTR), piggyback jejunal interposition reconstruction double-tract reconstruction (PJIRDTR), and total gastrectomy esophageal jejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis (TGRY) for the treatment of Siewert II and III AEG patients.
methodsA total of 300 Siewert II and III AEG patients admitted to Shanxi Tumor Hospital from June 2015 to December 2017 were prospectively selected. Patients were randomly divided into PJIRSTR group (n = 98), PJIRDTR group (n = 103), and TGRY group (n = 99) using the random number table method.
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in total operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time of first anal exhaust, and postoperative hospital stay among the three groups (F = 2.526, 0.457, 0.234, 0.453; P > 0.05). The reconstruction time of PJIRSTR group and PJIRDTR group was longer than that of TGRY group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in cases of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, abdominal infection, incision infection, ileus, and dumping syndrome in three groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of reflux esophagitis at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery in the PJIRSTR group and the PJIRDTR group were significantly lower than TGRY group in the same period (P < 0.05). Compared with PJIRDTR group and TGRY group, PJIRSTR group had a small fluctuation range of postoperative nutrition indexes and had basically recovered to the preoperative level at 18 months. Four patients of Visick grade IV presented in TGRY group 18 months postoperatively, which was significantly higher compared with the other two groups.
conclusionCompared with PJIRDTR and TGRY, PJIRSTR can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis and improve the long-term nutritional status of patients.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-IIR-16007733. Registered 07 November 2015 - Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.aspx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.