ArticleBMC genomics2019
Human gene expression variability and its dependence on methylation and aging.
Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inter-individual gene expression variability implies stable regulation of brain-biased genes across organs in three ray-finned fishes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multimodal bioinformatic analyses of genome-scale expression beyond gene-centric differential expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- A Manifold-Based Measure of Transcriptional Entropy for Quantifying Aging in Single Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation as a mutation-independent therapeutic strategy forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Aging and "Age-Related" Diseases - What Is the Relation?Aging and disease · 2024Review
- Quantifying transcriptome diversity: a review.Briefings in functional genomics · 2024Review
- Human transcriptional signature of protection afterHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Efficiently quantifying DNA methylation for bulk- and single-cell bisulfite data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Gene expression variability in long-term survivors of childhood cancer and cancer-free controls in response to ionizing irradiation.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- mGenome biology · 2022Article
- Comparative studies of genomic and epigenetic factors influencing transcriptional variation in two insect species.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Identification of differentially distributed gene expression and distinct sets of cancer-related genes identified by changes in mean and variability.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Incomplete Penetrance and Variable Expressivity: From Clinical Studies to Population Cohorts.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- microRNA Heterogeneity, Innate-Immune Defense and the Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Infection-A Commentary.Non-coding RNA · 2021Article
- Article
- Gene expression variability in human and chimpanzee populations share common determinants.eLife · 2020Article
- Transcriptional, Epigenetic and Metabolic Programming of Tumor-Associated Macrophages.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhenotypic variability of human populations is partly the result of gene polymorphism and differential gene expression. As such, understanding the molecular basis for diversity requires identifying genes with both high and low population expression variance and identifying the mechanisms underlying their expression control. Key issues remain unanswered with respect to expression variability in human populations. The role of gene methylation as well as the contribution that age, sex and tissue-specific factors have on expression variability are not well understood.
resultsHere we used a novel method that accounts for sampling error to classify human genes based on their expression variability in normal human breast and brain tissues. We find that high expression variability is almost exclusively unimodal, indicating that variance is not the result of segregation into distinct expression states. Genes with high expression variability differ markedly between tissues and we find that genes with high population expression variability are likely to have age-, but not sex-dependent expression. Lastly, we find that methylation likely has a key role in controlling expression variability insofar as genes with low expression variability are likely to be non-methylated.
conclusionsWe conclude that gene expression variability in the human population is likely to be important in tissue development and identity, methylation, and in natural biological aging. The expression variability of a gene is an important functional characteristic of the gene itself and the classification of a gene as one with Hyper-Variability or Hypo-Variability in a human population or in a specific tissue should be useful in the identification of important genes that functionally regulate development or disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.