Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31810437›Full record

Trial reportBMC palliative care2019

Oral medicinal cannabinoids to relieve symptom burden in the palliative care of patients with advanced cancer: a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised clinical trial of efficacy and safety of cannabidiol (CBD).

Phillip Good, Alison Haywood, Gauri Gogna, Jennifer Martin, Patsy Yates, Ristan Greer, Janet Hardy

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cannabidiol promotes apoptosis and downregulation of oncogenic factors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. 'What price do you put on your health?': Medical cannabis, financial toxicity and patient perspectives on medication access in advanced cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Phillip GoodMater Health Services, Mater Research Institute-University of Queensland, St Vincent's Private Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Qld, Australia. Phillip.Good@mater.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-0375
Alison HaywoodSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Gauri GognaGreenslopes Private Hospital, Gold Coast Health Service, Greenslopes, Australia.
Jennifer MartinThe Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence (ACRE), New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Patsy YatesSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Ristan GreerTorus Research, Mater Research Institute-University of Queensland, QLD, St Lucia, Australia.
Janet HardyMater Health Services, Mater Research Institute-University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Mater Health Services · AUGreenslopes Private Hospital · AUGriffith University · AUQueensland Health · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite improvements in medical care, patients with advanced cancer still experience substantial symptom distress. There is increasing interest in the use of medicinal cannabinoids, but there is little high quality evidence to guide clinicians. This study aims to define the role of cannabidiol (CBD) in the management of symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer undergoing standard palliative care. METHODS AND

designThis study is a multicentre, randomised, placebo controlled, two arm, parallel trial of escalating doses of oral CBD. It will compare efficacy and safety outcomes of a titrated dose of CBD (100 mg/mL formulation, dose range 50 mg to 600 mg per day) against placebo. There is a 2-week patient determined titration phase, using escalating doses of CBD or placebo to reach a dose that achieves symptom relief with tolerable side effects. This is then followed by a further 2-week assessment period on the stable dose determined in collaboration with clinicians. DISCUSSION: A major strength of this study is that it will target symptom burden as a whole, rather than just individual symptoms, in an attempt to describe the general improvement in wellbeing previously reported by some patients in open label, non controlled trials of medicinal cannabis. Randomisation with placebo is essential because of the well-documented over reporting of benefit in uncontrolled trials and high placebo response rates in cancer pain trials. This will be the first placebo controlled clinical trial to evaluate rigorously the efficacy, safety and acceptability of CBD for symptom relief in advanced cancer patients. This study will provide the medical community with evidence to present to patients wishing to access medicinal cannabis for their cancer related symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ALCTRN12618001220257 Registered 20/07/2018.

Indexed as

SyndromeAdministration, OralAdultCannabidiolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMedical MarijuanaMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CarePlacebosCannabidiolMedical MarijuanaPlacebosCancerCannabidiolCannabisPalliative careRCTSymptom control

Identifiers

PMID31810437
PMCPMC6898965
OpenAlexW2992312534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.