Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31810428›Full record

ArticleSocial neuroscience2021

Social interoception and social allostasis through touch: Legacy of the Somatovisceral Afference Model of Emotion.

Mary H Burleson, Karen S Quigley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hepatic interoception in health and disease.Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2024
    Review
  8. Evolutionarily conserved neural responses to affective touch in monkeys transcend consciousness and change with age.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Somatovisceral influences on emotional development.Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role of the Skin in Interoception: A Neglected Organ?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The role of the amygdala in processing social and affective touch.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary H BurlesonSchool of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University , Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Karen S QuigleyCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR) and Social and Community Reintegration Research (SoCRR) Program, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA , Bedford, MA, USA.

Funding

Affect regulation and Beta Amyloid: Maturational Factors in Aging and Age-Related PathologyR01MH113234 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI DICKERSON, BRADFORD C, ISAACOWITZ, DEREK M · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
Fundamental subcortical mechanisms of affective processingU01CA193632 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN, SATPUTE, AJAY · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA193632NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

John Cacioppo and colleagues' Somatovisceral Afference Model of Emotion (SAME) highlighted the importance of interoception in emotional experience. Here we compare how the SAME and the more recent theory of constructed emotion (TCE) view the role of interoceptive signals in creating emotional experiences. We describe the characteristics of touch sensations that are carried by thin, unmyelinated fibers called C-tactile afferents (CTs) to the posterior insula, and are thus deemed interoceptive despite their typically social (external) origin. We explore how this social interoceptive input might contribute to the emotion-related effects of social touch more generally, and speculate that all social touch, with or without CT afferent stimulation, can directly influence allostasis, or the predictive regulation of short- and long-term energy resources required by the body. Finally, we describe several features of CT-optimal touch that make it a potentially useful tool to help illuminate basic interoceptive mechanisms, emotion-related phenomena, and disorders involving atypical affect or somatosensation. These proposed ideas demonstrate the long intellectual reach of John Cacioppo and Gary Berntson's highly productive scientific collaboration, which was formative for the fields of social neuroscience, social psychophysiology, and affective neuroscience.

Indexed as

AllostasisInteroceptionTouch PerceptionEmotionsHumansTouchallostasisC-tactile afferentemotioninteroceptionpsychological constructionsocial touchSomatovisceral afference

Identifiers

PMID31810428
PMCPMC7299836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.