Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31810298›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Influence of Dental Composite Viscosity in Attachment Reproduction: An Experimental in Vitro Study.

Vincenzo D'Antò, Simone Muraglie, Beatrice Castellano, Ettore Candida, Maria Francesca Sfondrini, Andrea Scribante, Cristina Grippaudo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Attachments for the Orthodontic Aligner Treatment-State of the Art-A Comprehensive Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. In vitro comparison of different composite resins for aligner attachment production : Amount of adhesive flash, flash removal time, and shear bond strength.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clear Aligner Attachments: A Comprehensive Review.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Surface wear and adhesive failure of resin attachments used in clear aligner orthodontic treatment.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. New Materials and Techniques for Orthodontics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Predictability of Maxillary Molar Distalization and Derotation with Clear Aligners: A Prospective Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vincenzo D'AntòDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Simone MuraglieDental Institute, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00195 Rome, Italy.
Beatrice CastellanoDental Institute, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00195 Rome, Italy.
Ettore CandidaDental Institute, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00195 Rome, Italy.
Maria Francesca SfondriniUnit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Andrea ScribanteUnit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2760-0124
Cristina GrippaudoHead and Neck Department, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Dental Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, 00195 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9499-0556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttachments are composite auxiliaries that are used during a clear aligner orthodontic therapy to achieve difficult tooth movements. Two important factors are the planned configuration and the actual position of these auxiliary elements to obtain the desired force system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of different composite materials in the correct reproduction of attachment shape and position.

methodsThe materials that were considered in the study were a flowable resin, a dental restorative material, and an orthodontic composite. The attachments were created on three models of extracted teeth. Once the impressions were performed, 25 attachments of different shapes were added onto each virtual model to obtain the necessary templates to make the attachments. Each tested material was used to create a set of 25 attachments that were then scanned with an accuracy of 10μm. The resultant STL (stereolithography) files were superimposed onto the ones from the initial virtual plan, through Geomagic software, and the aligned scans were then compared while using a color map. The parameters that were calculated to make a comparison between the created attachments and the ideal ones were the maximum deviation in defect and in excess, the overflow, and the volume's difference. In addition to these measurements comparing the three above-mentioned groups, the difference in volume between all the ideal and realized samples were analyzed. To test for differences among the three groups, a one-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used with a Bonferroni post-hoc test. The level of significance was set at

resultsNo statistically significant results were found between the three groups regarding the maximum value in defect, the maximum value in excess, and the minimum value as control, while a statistically significant difference was found between the overflow of orthodontic resin when compared to the flowable composite.

conclusionsThe three materials that were used in this study were appropriate for attachment fabrication. The fidelity of attachment reproduction was similar when using the three different composites. The orthodontic composite showed more overflow when compared with the flowable one.

Indexed as

attachmentsclear alignerscomposite resindetail reproductionorthodonticsviscosity degree

Identifiers

PMID31810298
PMCPMC6926517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.