Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31810250›Full record

ReviewNutrients2019

The Potential for Plant-Based Diets to Promote Health Among Blacks Living in the United States.

Samara R Sterling, Shelly-Ann Bowen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Aspects of β-sitosterol's Pharmacology, Nutrition and Analysis.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioactive Compounds for Customized Brain Health: What Are We and Where Should We Be Heading?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  11. Cytotoxic Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samara R SterlingThe Peanut Institute 1, Albany, GA 31707, USA.
Shelly-Ann BowenICF International 2, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based diets are associated with reduced risks of various chronic diseases in the general population. However, it is unclear how these benefits translate to Blacks living in the United States, who are disproportionately burdened with heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. The objectives of this study were to: (1) review the general evidence of plant-based diets and health outcomes; (2) discuss how this evidence translates to Blacks following a plant-based diet; and (3) provide recommendations and considerations for future studies in this area. Interestingly, although the evidence supporting plant-based diets in the general population is robust, little research has been done on Blacks specifically. However, the available data suggests that following a plant-based diet may reduce the risk of heart disease and possibly cancer in this population. More research is needed on cardiovascular disease risk factors, cancer subtypes, and other chronic diseases. Further, attention must be given to the unique individual, familial, communal, and environmental needs that Blacks who follow plant-based diets may have. Interventions must be culturally appropriate in order to achieve long-term success, and providing low-cost, flavorful, and nutritious options will be important.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanChronic DiseaseDiet, VegetarianHealth PromotionHealth Status DisparitiesHumansUnited StatesAfrican Americanchronic diseasediet patternshealth disparitiesplant-basedveganvegetarian

Identifiers

PMID31810250
PMCPMC6949922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.