Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31810217›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

A Randomised Trial to Optimise Gestational Weight Gain and Improve Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes through Antenatal Dietary, Lifestyle and Exercise Advice: The OPTIMISE Randomised Trial.

Jodie M Dodd, Andrea R Deussen, Jennie Louise

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jodie M DoddDiscipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6363-4874
Andrea R DeussenDiscipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6210-1876
Jennie LouiseDiscipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-0290

Funding

Llloyd Cox Strategic Research Excellence Award N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are well-recognised associations between excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes and caesarean birth. The aim of the OPTIMISE randomised trial was to evaluate the effect of dietary and exercise advice among pregnant women of normal body mass index (BMI), on pregnancy and birth outcomes. The trial was conducted in Adelaide, South Australia. Pregnant women with a body mass index in the healthy weight range (18.5-24.9 kg/m

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainAdultBirth WeightCesarean SectionCounselingDiabetes, GestationalDietExerciseFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLife StyleOverweightPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy Outcomedietary and lifestyle interventiongestational weight gainrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31810217
PMCPMC6949931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.