Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31809509›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Social influences on smoking cessation in mid-life: Prospective cohort of UK women.

Jaime L Martin, Isobel Barnes, Jane Green, Gillian K Reeves, Valerie Beral, Sarah Floud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaime L MartinFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Isobel BarnesCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kindom.
Jane GreenCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kindom.
Gillian K ReevesCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kindom.
Valerie BeralCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kindom.
Sarah FloudCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kindom.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-9117

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16491Cancer Research UK C570/A16491Medical Research Council MR/K02700X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDecisions to quit smoking are thought to be influenced by social factors such as friends, family and social groups, but there have been few attempts to examine comprehensively the influence of a range of social factors on smoking cessation. In the largest study to date, we examined whether smoking cessation was associated with marital status and the smoking habits of a partner, socio-economic status and social participation.

methodsIn the prospective Million Women Study, 53,650 current smokers in 2001 (mean age 58.3, SD 4.4) reported their smoking status 4 years later; and reported on social factors on both occasions. Logistic regression yielded odds ratios (ORs) and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) for stopping smoking in the next 4 years by marital status, whether their partner smoked, deprivation, education, and participation in social activities.

results31% (16,692) of the current smokers at baseline had stopped after 4 years. Smokers who were partnered at baseline were more likely to quit than those who were not partnered (OR 1.13, 99% CI 1.06-1.19). Compared to having a partner who smoked throughout, those who had a non-smoking partner throughout were more likely to quit (OR 2.01, 99% CI 1.86-2.17), and those who had a partner who smoked at baseline but stopped smoking in the next 4 years were even more likely to quit (OR 6.00, 5.41-6.67). There was no association with cessation for education or deprivation. The association with social participation varied by type of activity but was null overall.

conclusionWomen who were partnered were most likely to stop smoking if their partner also stopped smoking. There was little evidence of a strong influence of either socio-economic status or social participation on smoking cessation. These results emphasise the importance of a spouse's smoking habits on the likelihood of a smoker successfully quitting smoking.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationSocial ParticipationCohort StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMarital StatusMiddle AgedOdds RatioProspective StudiesSocial ClassUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID31809509
PMCPMC6897408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.