Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31809506›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2019

Elective and nonelective cesarean section and obesity among young adult male offspring: A Swedish population-based cohort study.

Viktor H Ahlqvist, Margareta Persson, Cecilia Magnusson, Daniel Berglind

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03918044 (Elective and Non-elective Cesarean Section and the Risk for Obesity Among Young Male Conscripts), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03918044 completednot on this map

Elective and Non-elective Cesarean Section and the Risk for Obesity Among Young Male Conscripts: a Population-based Cohort and Matched-sibling Analysis.

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2019 to 2019Enrolled97,291ConditionsCaesarean Section, Obesity, Cesarean Section Complications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Caesarean section and obesity in young adult offspring: Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Health outcomes following caesarean birth- An observational study of twins discordant for mode of delivery.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026
    Article
  6. RETRACTED: Effect ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Viktor H AhlqvistDepartment of Global Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1383-3194
Margareta PerssonDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Cecilia MagnussonDepartment of Global Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel BerglindDepartment of Global Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have suggested that cesarean section (CS) is associated with offspring overweight and obesity. However, few studies have been able to differentiate between elective and nonelective CS, which may differ in their maternal risk profile and biological pathway. Therefore, we aimed to examine the association between differentiated forms of delivery with CS and risk of obesity in young adulthood. METHODS AND

findingsUsing Swedish population registers, a cohort of 97,291 males born between 1982 and 1987 were followed from birth until conscription (median 18 years of age) if they conscripted before 2006. At conscription, weight and height were measured and transformed to World Health Organization categories of body mass index (BMI). Maternal and infant data were obtained from the Medical Birth Register. Associations were evaluated using multinomial and linear regressions. Furthermore, a series of sensitivity analyses were conducted, including fixed-effects regressions to account for confounders shared between full brothers. The mothers of the conscripts were on average 28.5 (standard deviation 4.9) years old at delivery and had a prepregnancy BMI of 21.9 (standard deviation 3.0), and 41.5% of the conscripts had at least one parent with university-level education. Out of the 97,291 conscripts we observed, 4.9% were obese (BMI ≥ 30) at conscription. The prevalence of obesity varied slightly between vaginal delivery, elective CS, and nonelective CS (4.9%, 5.5%, and 5.6%, respectively), whereas BMI seemed to be consistent across modes of delivery. We found no evidence of an association between nonelective or elective CS and young adulthood obesity (relative risk ratio 0.96, confidence interval 95% 0.83-1.10, p = 0.532 and relative risk ratio 1.02, confidence interval 95% 0.88-1.18, p = 0.826, respectively) as compared with vaginal delivery after accounting for prepregnancy maternal BMI, maternal diabetes at delivery, maternal hypertension at delivery, maternal smoking, parity, parental education, maternal age at delivery, gestational age, birth weight standardized according to gestational age, and preeclampsia. We found no evidence of an association between any form of CS and overweight (BMI ≥ 25) as compared with vaginal delivery. Sibling analysis and several sensitivity analyses did not alter our findings. The main limitations of our study were that not all conscripts had available measures of anthropometry and/or important confounders (42% retained) and that our cohort only included a male population.

conclusionsWe found no evidence of an association between elective or nonelective CS and young adulthood obesity in young male conscripts when accounting for maternal and prenatal factors. This suggests that there is no clinically relevant association between CS and the development of obesity. Further large-scale studies are warranted to examine the association between differentiated forms of CS and obesity in young adult offspring.

trial registrationRegistered as observational study at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03918044.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdolescentAdultBirth WeightCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDiabetes, GestationalFemaleHumansMaleMaternal AgeOverweightPediatric ObesityPregnancyRisk FactorsSweden

Identifiers

PMID31809506
PMCPMC6897402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.