Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808923›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Assessment of the Diagnostic Utility of Serum MicroRNA Classification in Patients With Diffuse Glioma.

Makoto Ohno, Juntaro Matsuzaki, Junpei Kawauchi, Yoshiaki Aoki, Junichiro Miura, Satoko Takizawa, Ken Kato, Hiromi Sakamoto, Yuko Matsushita, Masamichi Takahashi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gliomas: Assessment of Preanalytical Variables.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Liquid biomarkers in glioma.Brain tumor pathology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Makoto OhnoDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntaro MatsuzakiDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Junpei KawauchiDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki AokiDynacom Co, Ltd, Chiba, Japan.
Junichiro MiuraDynacom Co, Ltd, Chiba, Japan.
Satoko TakizawaDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken KatoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromi SakamotoDepartment of Biobank and Tissue Resources, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko MatsushitaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masamichi TakahashiDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuji MiyakitaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi IchimuraDivision of Brain Tumor Translational Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshitaka NaritaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro OchiyaDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A blood-based screening tool for detecting diffuse glioma is necessary to improve clinical outcomes. Objectives: To establish models using serum microRNAs to distinguish patients with diffuse glioma from control individuals without cancer (the Glioma Index) and to differentiate glioblastoma (GBM), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and metastatic brain tumors (the 3-Tumor Index). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, case-control diagnostic study included 157 patients with diffuse glioma and 109 patients with central nervous system (CNS) diseases other than diffuse glioma diagnosed from August 1, 2008, through May 1, 2016, and 314 sex- and age-matched controls without cancer. Samples of patients with diffuse glioma and controls were randomly divided into training and validation set 1, and those of patients with CNS diseases other than diffuse glioma were allocated to an exploratory set. Samples of patients with GBM, PCNSL, and metastatic brain tumors were randomly divided into training and validation set 2. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The expression of 2565 microRNAs was assessed, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: A total of 580 patients were included in the analysis (309 [53.3%] male; median age, 57 years [range, 10-87 years]). In training set 1, 100 patients with diffuse glioma (median age, 56 years [range, 14-87 years]; 55 male [55.0%]) were compared with 200 control patients (median age, 56 years [range, 14-87 years]; 105 male [52.5%]), and the Glioma Index was constructed using 3 microRNAs (miR-4763-3p, miR-1915-3p, and miR-3679-5p). In validation set 1, the AUC was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00); sensitivity, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-1.00); and specificity, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00). The Glioma Index classified 39 of 42 PCNSL samples (92.9%) and 25 of 28 metastatic brain tumor samples (89.3%) as positive and 2 of 2 spinal tumors (100%) as negative in the exploratory set. In training set 2, 68 patients with GBM, 34 with PCNSL, and 23 with metastatic brain tumor were compared, and the 3-Tumor Index was constructed using 48 microRNAs. The 3-Tumor Index had an accuracy of 0.80, positively detecting 16 of 17 GBM samples (94.1%), 4 of 5 metastatic brain tumor samples (80.0%), and 4 of 8 PCNSL samples (50.0%) in validation set 2. Conclusions and Relevance: This study appears to have identified promising serum microRNA combinations for detecting diffuse glioma and for assessing histologic features of brain tumors.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGlioblastomaGliomaHumansLymphomaMaleMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID31808923
PMCPMC6902771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.