ArticleAge and ageing2020
Projections of care for older people with dementia in England: 2015 to 2040.
Article in Age and ageing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Unequal ends: A systematic review comparing place of death in rural, coastal and urban areas for older people with dementia to cancer.Palliative medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of the Needs of Children and Young People of a Parent Diagnosed With Young-Onset-Dementia: Informing a Nursing Intervention.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Distinct trajectories of emotional distress and physical health among informal dementia caregivers surrounding bereavement: a systematic review.BMC psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Wearable Technology, Smart Home Systems, and Mobile Apps for the Self‑Management of Patient Outcomes in Dementia Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Chinese herbal medicine for obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of treatments for people living with severe dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.Ageing research reviews · 2022Pooled it
- A policy scoping review of how 'Hospitals at Home' can and could support people with dementia.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Observational
- Prevention of dementia using mobile phone applications (PRODEMOS) - a health-economic cost-utility analysis in people aged 55-75 years with low socio-economic status.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Article
- Research on dementia and inequalities in care and support - a map of the terrain and discussion of key issues.International journal for equity in health · 2026Review
- Personal and Family Perspectives Regarding Neurodegenerative Disorder Risk.Journal of community medicine & public health · 2026Article
- Nature-based interventions for people living with dementia and their carers: a scoping review.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Review
- Evidence-based construction and validation of an agent-based model of community integrated care for older adults living with dementia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Non-exercise, home-based interventions for persons living with dementia: A commentary on a systematic review.British journal of neuroscience nursing · 2025Article
- Social prescribing in primary care for people living with dementia: a qualitative exploration of different roles and services in England.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Associations Between Sleep Duration and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Article
- Minoritised ethnic groups and modifiable dementia risk: a scoping review of UK-based evidence.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2025Article
- Small-diffusible aggregates, plaques, tangles, and dynamic equilibria: Untangling Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- The burden of informal family caregiving in Europe, 2000-2050: a microsimulation modelling study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of older people with dementia and the cost of caring for them, already substantial, are expected to rise due to population ageing.
objectiveThis study makes projections of the number of older people with dementia receiving unpaid care or using care services and associated costs in England.
methodsThe study drew on up-to-date information for England from multiple sources including data from the CFASII study, output from the PACSim dynamic microsimulation model, Office for National Statistics population projections and data from the MODEM cohort study. A simulation model was built to make the projections.
resultsWe project that the number of older people with dementia will more than double in the next 25 years. The number receiving unpaid or formal care is projected to rise by 124%, from 530,000 in 2015 to 1,183,000 in 2040. Total cost of dementia is projected to increase from £23.0 billion in 2015 to £80.1 billion in 2040, and average cost is projected to increase from £35,100 per person per year in 2015 to £58,900 per person per year in 2040. Total and average costs of social care are projected to increase much faster than those of healthcare and unpaid care.
conclusionThe numbers of people with dementia and associated costs of care will rise substantially in the coming decades, unless new treatments enable the progression of the condition to be prevented or slowed. Care and support for people with dementia and their family carers will need to be increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.